The United States Department of Health and Human Services released a
number of updates to its HIV treatment guidelines for adults on January 10th.
These include:
- A refinement of recommendations on when to
start antiretroviral treatment in people diagnosed with tuberculosis. In people
with CD4 counts below 200 cells/mm3 antiretroviral treatment
should begin no more than two to four weeks after starting TB treatment. In
people with CD4 counts between 200 and 500 antiretroviral treatment should
be delayed no more than two to eight weeks after starting TB treatment. A
majority of the guidelines panel also recommend that HIV treatment should
be commenced within eight weeks of starting TB treatment in people with
CD4 counts above 500 cells/mm3.
- CD4 cell counts in people on suppressive
antiretroviral therapy should only be monitored every 6 to 12 months, unless
there is a concomitant clinical condition or the patient is receiving
immunosuppressive drugs.
- Virological failure should be defined as a
viral load above 200 copies/ml, in order to rule out isolated blips or assay
varations.
- Maraviroc /AZT/3TC is added to the list of acceptable
regimens for first-line treatment. Combining maraviroc with
either Truvada (Tenofovir/FTC)
or Epzicom (abacavir/3TC,
marketed as Kivexa outside North America) is described as `may be acceptable
but more data needed`.
- Saquinavir-based treatment is downgraded from
`Alternative` to `Acceptable but use with caution` as a result
of a recent warning regarding abnormalities in cardiac rhythm in healthy volunteers
who received the drug.
- Genotypic resistance testing for integrase
inhibitor resistance should be considered at the time of failure of
integrase inhibitor-containing treatment, in order to guide any future
use of integrase inhibitors. At present there is only one integrase
inhibitor, raltegravir, available for prescription. Subsequent viral
suppression after failure of raltegravir treatment may make it difficult
to determine the integrase inhibitor resistance profile, should a patient
require a new integrase inhibitor in the future. The panel also encourages
physicians to think about the possibility of transmitted integrase
inhibitor resistance in patients new to treatment, and in particular to
consider whether the patient’s source of infection was receiving an
integrase inhibitor, since integrase inhibitor resistance is not currently
a part of the standard panel of genotypic resistance tests that ought to
be carried out for any patient starting treatment.