Treatment
containing tenofovir is associated with a higher risk of bone fractures in
people living with HIV, but a single infusion of zoledronic acid, a drug used
in the treatment of osteoporosis, can protect against bone loss, two studies
presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2016) in
Boston show.
In another study,
bone loss associated with the use of tenofovir in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was
shown to reverse quickly after the use of tenofovir ceased (see separate
report).
HIV causes bone
loss, and a large
case-controlled study in Denmark has shown that HIV infection increases the
risk of fractures. There is also evidence of a loss of bone mineral density in
the first year after starting antiretroviral therapy.
Tenofovir use is
associated with bone mineral loss, although in most people the extent of bone
loss is modest, occurs mainly in the first year of treatment and its long-term
consequences are unclear. In particular, previous studies which have identified
bone loss in people taking tenofovir have not been able to show whether this
results in a higher risk of fractures.
Since tenofovir is
one of the most widely-prescribed antiretrovirals (contained in Truvada and several fixed dose combinations including Atripla), and because many people will
take the drug for prolonged periods, it is important to know more about
fractures and a more serious complication of bone mineral loss, osteonecrosis,
in which bone dies.
Tenofovir and fracture risk in the EuroSIDA cohort
To address the
question of whether tenofovir or other drugs are associated with a higher risk
of fracture and osteonecrosis, investigators carried out an analysis of
fracture risk and osteonecrosis in the EuroSIDA cohort, which follows people
with HIV in Europe and Argentina.
Patients followed in
the EuroSIDA cohort after 2004 were included in the study. The end-points were
fracture, osteonecrosis, death or last follow-up. A series of analyses were
conducted to determine the risk factors associated with fracture and
osteonecrosis. Use of individual antiretroviral drugs (ever, current and
cumulative exposure) was included in the final multivariate analysis.
The 11,820
patients recruited to the study were followed for a total of 86,118 person-years. Patients had a median age of 41 years and 86% were white. Median CD4
cell count at baseline was 440 cells/mm3 and 70% of patients at
enrolment had an undetectable viral load.
During follow-up
618 fractures (incidence 7.2 per 1000 person-years) and 89 cases of
osteonecrosis (incidence 1 per 1000 person-years) were recorded. Fractures most
commonly occurred in the arms (122), legs (135) and ribs (44), although 202 reported
fractures occurred at unrecorded sites. Of the fractures, 132 were recorded as
osteoporotic (considered to have occurred as a result of reduced bone mineral
density).
The incidence of fractures
was highest in people with current CD4 cell counts below 200 cells/mm3 (8.9 per
1000 person-years of follow-up) and lowest in people with CD4 cell counts above
500 (5.5 per 1000 py).
After adjusting
for possible confounders, factors associated with an increased risk of fracture
included older age, body mass index (BMI) < 18, injecting drug use, lower
baseline CD4 count, co-infection with hepatitis C virus, previous
osteonecrosis, a history of fracture, non-AIDS related cancer and
cardiovascular disease in the previous twelve months.
The incidence of
osteonecrosis was much lower, at 1 case per 1000 person-years of follow-up in
people with CD4 counts below 200 and 0.8 cases per 1000 person-years in people
with CD4 counts above 500, a non-significant difference. Risk factors for osteonecrosis
were the same as those for fracture, with the exception of non-AIDS related
cancer.
Overall incidence
of fracture among patients ever exposed to tenofovir was 8.1 per 1000 person-years. This compared to an incidence of 4.7 per 1000 person-years for patients
never treated with this drug. Incidence among patients currently taking
tenofovir was 7.8 per 1000 person-years, compared to 5.6 for patients currently
off this drug.
The association
between tenofovir use and fracture risk persisted in multivariate analysis.
Patients who had ever used tenofovir (1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70) and also
individuals currently taking tenofovir (1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49) had a
significantly increased risk of fractures. There was no association between
longer use of tenofovir and increased risk of fracture. No other antiretroviral
increased the risk of fracture.
Asked why
cumulative tenofovir exposure did not increase the risk of fracture, presenter
Alvaro Borges of the University of Copenhagen suggested that the findings were
consistent with the observation that bone mineral loss due to tenofovir
treatment occurs in the first year of treatment and does not worsen with
prolonged treatment.
No antiretroviral
was associated with an increased risk of osteonecrosis.
A number of
factors – HIV-related and non-HIV-related – increase the risk of fracture and
osteonecrosis, concluded the investigators. Tenofovir was the only anti-HIV
drug associated with an increased risk of fracture.
Zoledronic acid
Zoledronic acid is
a biphosphonate drug licensed for the treatment of bone-related cancers
alongside chemotherapy and for the treatment of osteoporosis in men and women
at increased risk of fracture. It is administered as an infusion once a year.
The drug slows down the loss of calcium from the bones, reducing the risk of
fractures.
Reduced bone
mineral density is common in people living with HIV, and as previously noted, modest
bone mineral loss is a common occurrence during the first year of
antiretroviral therapy. Investigators from Emory University School of Medicine,
Atlanta, designed a study to investigate whether a single infusion of
zoledronic acid could limit bone mineral loss during the first year of
antiretroviral therapy.
This was a
single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled phase 2 study.
Patients starting HIV therapy for the first time with no history of bone loss
were eligible for inclusion. All participants received an antiretroviral regime
of atazanavir with tenofovir/emtricitabine. Patients were randomised to receive
a single 5mg infusion of zoledronic acid or placebo. The study lasted 48 weeks
with assessment of bone turnover and bone mineral density at baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48.
Sixty-three
patients were enrolled. The majority (84%) were black and a fifth were women.
Mean age at baseline was 40 years.
Therapy with zoledronic
acid was associated with a 74% reduction in bone loss by week 12. The
benefits persisted through to week 24 and 48 (65% and 56% reduction,
respectively, relative to placebo).
By week 12,
patients in the treatment arm had an 8% increase in lumbar spine bone mineral
density relative to placebo, the difference increasing to 11% at weeks 24 and
48. At week 48, lumbar spine bone mineral density had increased by 2% in
patients treated with zoledronic acid; this compared to a 4% decrease among
patients who received the placebo. Lumbar spine T- and Z-scores were
significantly higher among patients who received zoledronic acid versus placebo
at all follow-up points (all p < 0.05). Similar trends were also observed at
the hip and femoral neck.
Zoledronic acid
was well tolerated with no major adverse events reported. Rates of viral
suppression and CD4 cell increase were similar between the treatment and
placebo arms.
The investigators
conclude that a single infusion of zoledronic acid at the time HIV therapy was
started prevented antiretroviral-induced bone resorption and bone loss at key
fracture-prone body sites. The benefits of therapy were present at week 12
and persisted through 48-weeks of follow-up. The researchers suggest that
zoledronic acid could be used as a prophylaxis against bone mineral loss during
the first year of antiretroviral treatment and call for a multicentre randomised
trial to confirm their findings.