Patients
attending an urban primary healthcare clinic in the inner city of Johannesburg who got a CD4
cell count at the time of HIV diagnosis and were eligible for ART were more
than twice as likely to start treatment within three months of diagnosis than
those who received their results one week after diagnosis.
However,
among patients not yet eligible for treatment, having to return to the clinic
for a CD4 count one week later resulted in significantly better retention in
care.
Furthermore,
even with immediate provision of CD4 results, one-third of those eligible for
treatment did not come back to the clinic to start treatment within three
months.
Mamsallah
Faal and colleagues report their findings from a randomised study published in
the advance online edition of the Journal
of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.
South Africa with close to
six million people living with HIV now has the largest antiretroviral treatment
programme in the world, with an estimated 1.4 million on treatment by May 2011.
Achieving
the government’s goal of providing comprehensive care to 80% of people living
with HIV and their families by the end of 2011 necessitates a service that
includes early diagnosis of HIV, enrolment and retention in care with prompt
access to ART for those who need it.
The
continued loss to follow-up from pre-ART care and poor retention in care before
starting ART makes meeting these targets especially challenging for health
planners. People present late for treatment with low CD4 cell counts resulting
in high death rates within the first year.
Other
factors contributing to loss to care include distance to the health centre, a
history of TB treatment, being male, stigma and denial of HIV status.
The
process of getting treatment further contributes to the loss. The authors cite
a study where only 45% of (7005) newly diagnosed patients presented for CD4
testing; of which 50% were eligible for ART but only a third started.
In
South Africa CD4 testing is done through centralised laboratories and results
are available within a week.
In
inner city Johannesburg
approximately 1300 people go for HIV testing every month, of whom 30% test
positive. However only 55% to 65% return for their CD4 results.
Getting
a CD4 result immediately after HIV diagnosis has been proposed as a means to
simplify the process and reduce the time lag between diagnosis and treatment so
improving enrolment in care and treatment outcomes.
The
authors undertook a three-arm study at the Esselen clinic, an urban primary
healthcare clinic in the inner city of Johannesburg.
Patients who were undergoing HIV testing and counselling were randomised to one
of three care pathway arms if their test result was positive:
A CD4 cell count result delivered immediately
after the HIV diagnosis
A
leaflet explaining the care pathway given at the time of diagnosis, with a
request to return for the CD4 cell count result one week later
Standard
of care: request to return for the CD4 cell count result one week later.
Patients
were considered eligible for immediate antiretroviral treatment if they had a
CD4 count at or below 215 cells/mm3, since a count at this level would imply that
the CD4 cell count would fall below 200 – the threshold for treatment
initiation in South Africa
at the time the study was conducted – by the time pre-ART preparation had been
completed.
Of
the 344 HIV infected patients in the study 65% were female, median age 30, over
a third reported full-time employment and over three-quarters lived locally
(within a 10 kilometre radius). Over 60% were first-time testers of which 84%
were self-referral (walk-in and not referred by a healthcare worker).
The
median baseline CD4 cell count for the cohort was 300 cells/mm3
(IQR: 168-473) and for the third eligible for ART the median CD4 cell count was
122 cells/mm3 (IQR:60-174).
Forty-seven
per cent of those who received an immediate CD4 result and eligible for
treatment reported for further care, compared with 33% of those who followed
the standard care pathway (p=0.011). Patients who received an immediate result
were 2.6 times more likely to start antiretroviral treatment within three
months of diagnosis (p=0.0004).
However,
in those not eligible for ART, receiving a CD4 result immediately after HIV
diagnosis did not increase the numbers in pre-ART care. Indeed, among those not yet eligible for ART, the
patients in the standard of care arm who had to return for their results were almost twice as likely to seek further
care (RR1.98, 95% CI: 1.42-2.7, p=0.0002).
As
in other studies reporting for continued care increased with age.
Close
to one in two patients (49%) did not collect their CD4 results one week after
HIV diagnosis, underscoring the extent of pre-ART losses.
Nonetheless
even when knowing their CD4 count at the time of testing, only 65% of those
eligible for ART presented for treatment, and for those not eligible, only 40%
enrolled for monitoring at the pre-ART site.
Limitations
include patients lost to follow-up may have accessed care elsewhere since newly
diagnosed patients are not assigned unique identifiers so cannot be
traced.
The
cost-effectiveness of providing CD4 counts immediately after HIV diagnosis was
not assessed since the focus was the effect of this intervention on patient
care. Such an analysis is essential for effective decentralisation of CD4
diagnostics.
The
authors conclude “with the likely expansion of HIV infected numbers after the
HIV counselling and testing campaign [in South Africa], research priorities
will need to be targeted at understanding factors that can improve engagement
in pre-ART care as well as developing evidence-based models for pre-ART care.
Underpinning all…is the urgent need for unique identifiers for HIV-infected
patients so monitoring efforts of how and when patients are accessing care are
better informed.”