Researchers are no nearer to identifying the causes
of body fat changes during HAART after the First International Workshop on
Adverse Drug Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV last month in San
Diego.
The meeting, organised to review data and develop a
consensus definition of the syndrome which has been labelled lipodystrophy,
heard several presentations which suggest that the causes of body fat changes
may be multi-factorial and even more complex than originally suggested. The
meeting heard little about the potential reversal or prevention of
lipodystrophy, largely because the syndrome is poorly understood. Current
discussion of the causes and treatment of lipodystrophy resembles the early
years of AIDS research.
For a detailed description of the syndrome and
background on some of the topics discussed in this report see href="http://www.aidsmap.com/article.asp?articleID=1661&heading3=Body+fat+changes+on+HAART+%">http://www.aidsmap.com/article.asp?articleID=1661&heading3=Body+fat+changes+on+HAART+% size=2 face=arial>
Defining the syndrome(s)
One purpose of the meeting was to draw up
common criteria to define what sort of body fat changes and lipid changes will
be defined as significant for the purposes of research. It is becoming apparent,
noted several speakers, that we may be dealing with several different syndromes
with different causes and different prospects of reversal, rather than a
continuum of lipid changes with one cause and one treatment. Dr Ah Garg, an
expert on lipodystrophy from the days when 200 hereditary cases was considered
`a lot', described many different forms (see below), and Dr Matthew Liang of
Harvard Medical School described the enormous complexity of defining the many
distinct rheumatic syndromes.
The Workshop also tried to introduce a little more
precision into the terms being used to describe various body fat changes.
Strictly speaking, the term lipodystrophy should be used to describe central
visceral fat accumulation. Fat loss from the arms, legs, face or buttocks should
be defined as lipoatrophy. As became clear from the cohort study reports at the
meeting, the distinction is important because some people develop one form of
body fat change but not the other, whilst others display both to some degree. If
these changes have different causes, the search for ways of preventing or
reversing the changes will be assisted by precise reporting.
Triglyceride and cholesterol
changes
Protease inhibitors may directly interfere with the
functioning of low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. This protein
clears triglyceride-rich low density lipoprotein from the blood. Inhibition of
this protein might explain the increase in triglycerides seen in many people
after commencing PI therapy.
The current working hypothesis published by Andrew
Carr and David Cooper, suggests that PIs are responsible for the syndrome
because they block the binding of all-trans retinoic acid and hence its
subsequent metabolism into 9-cis retinoic acid, which is essential for the
production of fat cells and the proper storage of lipids. By interfering with
this process, protease inhibitors block the differentiation and apoptosis of
adipocytes (fat cells).
Stephen Sturley of Columbia University reported that
the active site of HIV protease bears a close resemblance to a string of
amino-acids on the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (abstract
2). A reduction in LRP activity results in a reduction in lipoprotein clearance,
and two to three fold elevations in triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, similar
to those seen in people taking protease inhibitors. Dr Sturley suggested that
high baseline LDL cholesterol levels would result in lipoprotein receptors which
are already saturated, and less able to cope with any triglyceride elevation
after commencing PI therapy, and indeed, high baseline triglyceride levels have
been associated with the greatest triglyceride increases in several cohort
studies.
However, a team from Agouron Pharmaceuticals with
considerable expertise in crystallising HIV structures compared the crystal
structures of HIV protease inhibitors with that of CRABP1, and found little
potential for binding between protease inhibitors and CRABP1 (cis-retinoic acid
binding protein) (abstract 29). Instead, the team found that protease inhibitors
directly inhibit adipocyte differentiation by mechanisms unknown, with indinavir
having the strongest effect and amprenavir the weakest.
Furthermore, the Carr/Cooper hypothesis does not
explain why triglycerides can become elevated in individuals who take PI-sparing
regimens containing some nucleosides and those containing efavirenz.
Unfortunately, no lipids data from the 006 study of efavirenz were presented at
this meeting, even though Du Pont was able to offer 72 week data on the
incidence of body fat changes (abstract 39). Incidence of body fat changes was
remarkably small in all three arms of the study, including the indinavir arm,
and does not match the high incidence reported from much larger cohorts at the
Lipodystrophy Workshop (abstracts 12, 14-23).
A cross-sectional analysis of lipid elevations in 101
patients taking either efavirenz or nevirapine and two NRTIs was presented by Dr
Graeme Moyle of London's Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. Non-fasting
cholesterol samples were elevated in 32% of efavirenz recipients and 20% of
nevirapine recipients. Triglyceride levels were elevated in 6% of efavirenz
recipients and 2% of nevirapine rceipients. Those who had received prior PI
treatment were more likely to have elevated lipids on NNRTI treatment (abstract
54).
Carl Grunfeld of Veterans Medical Centre, San
Francisco, described the lipid changes seen in HIV infection prior to the advent
of HAART. He noted that serum triglyceride levels were high in people diagnosed
with AIDS, and that these high levels corresponded with high levels of
circulating interferon-alpha, and the clearance of triglycerides was slowed
after a high fat meal. Levels of HDL cholesterol declined to levels associated
with increased cardiovascular risk, and taken together these trends are a
typical response to acute infection.
AZT monotherapy significantly reduces triglyceride
levels and interferon levels, yet triglyceride increases have been reported in a
moderate proportion of individuals taking some dual nucleoside combinations.
These increases are modest in comparison to those seen in people taking protease
inhibitors, noted Dr Grunfeld, who went on to discuss the risk of cardiovascular
disease as a consequence of these lipid changes. These risks have been analysed
at several previous meetings and are discussed in more detail in href="http://www.aidsmap.com/article.asp?articleID=1728&heading3=Heart+disease+and+HAART">http://www.aidsmap.com/article.asp?articleID=1728&heading3=Heart+disease+and+HAART
Although a number of reports of heart attacks and
angina putatively associated with PI treatment have appeared in the past year,
no group has yet investigated the physical condition of the arteries of people
taking PIs. At the Lipodystrophy Workshop a group from Italy reported on 13
HIV-positive patients with a median of 14 months PI experience who underwent a
variety of tests to detect early signs of atherosclerotic plaques and altered
blood flow in the common and internal carotid arteries. Six out of 13 had some
arterial dysfunction, a higher proportion than expected, although age-matched
controls not taking PIs and HIV-negative controls were not used in this study.
Four patients had thickening of the intima (commonly referred to as `furring up'
of the arteries , whilst several patients had plaques (large unstable
accumulations and blood and fat cells which if ruptured can cause thrombosis and
blockage of the artery) (abstract 42). A larger scale prospective study of this
type with properly matched controls would have considerable value in assessing
the cardiovascular significance of lipid changes on HAART.
Insulin resistance
Insulin resistance has also been widely reported in
people taking protease inhibitors, although the incidence varies between
cohorts.
Insulin resistance may be linked to the quantity of
central abdominal fat. The quantity of central abdominal fat is directly
correlated to insulin resistance in muscle tissue, but insulin resistance occurs
before central fat accumulation. How one triggers the other is still unclear,
reported Don Chisholm of St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, but disturbances of
lipid metabolism are known to contribute to insulin resistance. Indeed, diabetes
in HIV-negative people may be treated with a group of drugs called
thiazolidinediones which work by encouraging the storage of fatty acids in
peripheral fat tissue rather than central fat tissue. This leads to a reduction
in insulin resistance. If fatty acids are being stored in central adipose tissue
and storage in peripheral tissue declines, insulin resistance would be a logical
outcome (although it will also be dependent on baseline sensitivity and diet to
some extent).
Not everyone who takes a protease inhibitor or other
anti-retroviral therapy develops insulin resistance. Dr Frank Goebel of Munich's
Ludwig-Maximilian University reported on changes in insulin sensitivity in a
cohort of patients studied in 1998. 36 untreated patients, 25 patients taking
NRTIs alone, 5 taking NRTIs and an NNRTI and 171 taking at least two NRTIs and
PI were compared for insulin resistance (abstract 5). Sensitivity was highest in
the untreated patients and lowest in those taking a protease inhibitor. 55% of
those taking a PI exhibited some degree of insulin resistance, with the highest
level of resistance occurring in those taking indinavir. 27% of those taking an
NRTI developed insulin resistance. There was no difference in insulin
sensitivity between those taking AZT/3TC and those taking d4T/ddI as part of
their combination. Muscle biopsies revealed that people on anti-retroviral
therapy who developed insulin resistance had fewer insulin receptors than
uninfected type II diabetics!
A team from the University of Southern California
School of Medicine (Bube, abstract 028) demonstrated that insulin sensitivity
declined by 30% in ten individuals within eight weeks of commencing indinavir
therapy, and that detectable changes in pancreatic beta cells also occurred
within eight weeks. Pancreatic beta cells regulate insulin secretion, which in
turns modulates blood levels of glucose and the development of hyperglycemia.
Within eight weeks of commencing indinavir, beta cell production of insulin had
declined when tested by infusing glucose into an individual's bloodstream.
Several studies in HIV-negative people have shown
that a small reduction in glucose tolerance is associated with a twofold
increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, research in diabetics
and other groups has demonstrated that exercise alone can restore insulin
sensitivity. Don Chisholm cited two studies, in Australian aboriginals and
Japanese sumo wrestlers. The Australian aboriginal population has a very high
incidence of diabetes, whilst retired sumo wrestlers have the highest incidence
of type II diabetes and heart attack in the Japanese population. In both groups
low levels of physical activity have been blamed. In the Australian study,
aboriginals with impaired glucose tolerance who went back to hunter/gatherer
lifestyles lost 1kg a week and reverted to almost normal glucose tolerance over
the course of several months. In the Japanese study, sub-cutaneous and
intra-abdominal fat of active and retired sumo wrestlers were compared. Despite
consuming more than 7,000 calories a day, the active wrestlers had little
intra-abdominal fat and near-normal insulin sensitivity. Their vast bulk was
comprised almost entirely of sub-cutaneous fat. Retired wrestlers had very large
amounts of intra-abdominal fat and impaired glucose tolerance.
How exactly exercise improves insulin sensitivity was
not discussed, and no data was presented at the Workshop regarding the impact of
exercise on insulin sensitivity in HIV infection. Several speakers noted that
exercise has been shown to have a greater impact on sub-cutaneous fat than on
visceral fat in studies of obesity.
Rare forms of lipodystrophy are inheritable, and Dr
Ambhimanyy Garg noted that lipodystrophy is associated with insulin resistance
in some of these syndromes. He also pointed out that many of the defects
proposed as mechanisms in HIV-associated lipodystophy have already been
investigated in cases of inherited and/or genetic lipodystrophy to estasblish
whether particular genetic mutations are associated with the syndromes. In the
case of familial partial lipodystrophy (Dunnigans type), the gene associated
with the syndrome is located very close to CRABP-2, at chromosome IQ21. CRABP-2
is the lipoprotein receptor-related protein which bears a close resemblence to
HIV protease.
Acquired forms of lipodystrophy which resemble those
reported in HIV have also been reported in uninfected individuals, and may be
associated with an auto-immune response. The syndrome is 2.6 times more common
in women than in men, conforming to the prevalence of auto-immune diseases in
the population. In 90% of cases auto-antibody to C3 nephritic factor has been
detected. C3neF lyses adipocytes in vitro. Anything which interferes with
adipocyte lipolysis is likely to interfere with peripheral and central fat
storage.
There is controversy in the field of lipidology as to
whether adipocytes can be regenerated if they are lost after adolescence. If
some factor in HIV infection or HIV treatment is destroying adipocytes, a
pessimistic interpretation is that fat loss, or lipoatrophy, is irreversible.
Whilst anecdotal reports have disputed this, none of the cohort or switching
studies presented at the San Diego meeting reported substantial reversal of
lipoatrophy except for a French group. Dr Thierry St Marc and colleagues at the
Hopital Herriot in Lyons discontinued d4T (stavudine) therapy in a controlled
non-randomised study in which 14 individuals with lipoatrophy on stable NRTI
therapy discontinued d4T, and 15 individuals with lipoatrophy on stable PI-based
therapy also discontinued. These individuals were compared with 15 and 16
individuals respectively on stable therapy with no evidence of body fat changes.
Subcutaneous fat in the mid-thigh and abdomen improved significantly after 6
months, although it was not restored to the levels seen in those without
lipoatrophy.
Findings of this sort have led some to suggest that
nucleoside analogues, and d4T in particular, may contribute to the development
of body fat changes.
Mitochondrial toxicity
Thomas Kakuda of University of Minnesota Antiviral
Pharmacology Laboratory has proposed that the inhibition of mitochondrial
polymerase gamma by NRTIs may eventually lead to the disruption of lipid
storage, transport and glucose uptake by adipocytes. Mitochondrial DNA is easily
damaged, and cannot be repaired if polymerase gamma is inhibited. As
mitochondrial DNA becomes more damaged, oxidative phosphorylation declines,
leading to cell damage, toxicity and cell death.
If mitochondrial DNA in central adipocytes is
impaired, it is suggested that intracellular lipids could accumulate. In
peripheral sub-cutaneous fat, Kakuda speculates that mitochondrial toxicity
could lead to apoptosis of adipocytes, leading to fat loss in the legs, arms,
buttocks and face. Whilst at first sight this may appear contradictory (like so
many other aspects of the syndromes), Kakuda and Kees Brinkman of the University
of Amsterdam both argue that different NRTIs are likely to have different
effects in different tissues, depending on the distribution and penetration of
NRTIs into particular cells, the distribution of adipocytes and the type of fat
in different locations, the cellular capacity to phosphorylate NRTIs, and the
extent to which various NRTIs are incorporated by mitochondrial polymerase
gamma.
Differential effects of protease inhibitors on
adipocytes were also reported at the Workshop by Jim Lenhard of Glaxo Wellcome,
based on experiments using human adipocytes in the laboratory and mouse models
(abstract 1).
In vitro, indinavir has been shown to block adipocyte
differentiation in the presence of retinoic acid and a retinoic acid receptor
antagonist may prevent the negative effects of indinavir on adipogenesis.
However, the effects of other protease inhibitors seem far more contradictory,
and any marketing statements about the relative effects of different PIs on body
fat changes must be treated with scepticism at this time.
For example, whilst indinavir blocks adipogenesis in
vitro, indinavir treatment was associated with 48% increase in epididymal fat in
a mouse model when fed on a low fat diet. There was no change in fat levels when
mice receiving indinavir received a high fat diet, although the researchers did
not demonstrate how they could tell that indinavir was being absorbed in these
animals (fat interferes with the absorption of indinavir in the human digestive
system). However, a similar phenomenon was seen in nelfinavir-treated mice.
Conversely, triglycerides rose in mice treated with a high fat diet and either
nelfinavir or saquinavir, but remained stable in those which received a low fat
diet. A low fat diet on any drug was associated with an increase in serum
glucose.
New adverse events on HAART
A number of new phenomena were reported at the
Workshop. Small lipomas, or irregular and localised fat deposits, have not been
reported previously in the medical literature, and do not usually occur on the
hands, feet or face. They are seen most frequently on the back, neck and trunk.
New York doctors reported two cases in which small lipomas appeared on the
hands, feet or face, during periods of subcutaneous fat depletion, one of which
resolved after human growth hormone treatment commenced. The authors speculated
that these pockets of fat might be protected from lipoatrophy due to some
genetic or molecular feature of this protected compartment of fat, and urged
further investigation of the characteristics of fat cells within lipomas of this
sort in order to shed further light on the pathophysiology of body fat changes
on HAART.
Andrew Carr and David Cooper reported a syndrome of
body fat changes, lactic acid elevation and liver dysfunction in people taking
NRTIs without protease inhibitors. 14 people on NRTIs were compared with 32
drug-naïve patients without body fat changes, 28 NRTI patients without body fat
changes, 44 PI recipients without body fat changes and 102 PI recipients who had
experienced body fat changes. The body fat changes in people on NRTIs were
either peripheral fat loss or abdominal weight gain, but in most cases the
abdominal weight gain was reported to be hepatomegaly (swelling of the liver).
Although the body fat changes looked very similar to those seen in PI
recipients, they were accompanied by elevated lactate, recent onset nausea,
fatigue and lower levels of lipids, glucose and insulin (abstract
11).
Lactic acidosis has been reported to be rare in NRTI
recipients, and this syndrome is a disturbing new feature.(see href="http://www.aidsmap.com/article.asp?articleID=1707&heading3=Lactic+acidosis&search=true">http://www.aidsmap.com/article.asp?articleID=1707&heading3=Lactic+acidosis&search=true
For further information). Kees Brinkman reported on
five patients in whom lactic acidosis on NRTI treatment appeared to have been
triggered by a period of severe metabolic stress, such as a severe infection or
malnutrition. Riboflavin or L-carnitine have been proposed as treatments for
lactic acidosis ( and L-carnitine has also been proposed as a treatment for
peripheral neuropathy, another potential mitochondrial toxicity). A team from St
Louis in the US reported 37 HIV-positive hospital admissions out of 1261 during
1996-98 has elevated lactic acid, but only 6.1% of these cases could be
definitively pinned on anti-retroviral therapy (sepsis was the most common cause
- 42.4% of cases) (abstract 69).
Cohorts offer no clear links between metabolic
and body fat changes
Despite intensive testing of all the metabolic
parameters reviewed at the meeting, cohort studies are unable to offer a
template for understanding how metabolic changes might be linked to body fat
changes, and in what order any of the metabolic events might be expected to
occur.
Although triglyceride changes generally occur before
reductions in insulin sensitivity and before changes in body fat, none of the
cohorts found a clear relationship. Not everyone with elevated triglycerides
subsequently developed body fat changes or insulin resistance, for example, and
lipoatrophy (peripheral fat loss) was not differentiated from lipodystrophy
(central fat accumulation) in terms of the metabolic changes which
occurred.
Lipodystrophy was associated with:
- Older age
- AIDS diagnosis prior to commencement of PI
treatment
- Protease inhibitor treatment
- Undetectable viral load
- Duration of treatment (the only drugs significantly
implicated were d4T and indinavir, but this may be a marker for the frequency
with which these drugs have been used in successful regimens that suppress viral
load below the limits of detection)
Several of these risk factors hint at the
contribution of pre-existing lipid profiles (age, AIDS diagnosis), but cohort
findings regarding the contribution of body mass index were contradictory (even
within cohorts), with the previously reported association between higher body
mass index (BMI) and body fat accumulation failing to recur.
What is clear from the cohort studies is that body
fat and metabolic changes are becoming increasingly common as the duration of
therapy lengthens, and a larger proportion of people than originally expected is
developing metabolic and physical abnormalities which cannot be explained. An
International Workshop on this subject was long overdue, and will hopefully
serve as a stimulus for better research, more discussion of the subject and a
greater sense of urgency about finding out why just three years after the
optimism of the Vancouver conference, the public face of AIDS once again has
hollow cheeks and a wasted appearance.
References
First International Workshop on Adverse Drug
Reactions and Lipodystrophy in HIV, San Diego, 1999
Abstracts will be available from href="http://www.intmedpress.com/">http://www.intmedpress.com