Toronto salvage therapy workshop: highlights

This article is more than 24 years old.

Second study shows drug holidays

associated with better salvage response

Twenty six out of thirty nine Frankfurt patients who took a drug holiday

Glossary

salvage therapy

Any treatment regimen used after a number of earlier regimens have failed. People with HIV who have experienced side-effects and/or developed resistance to many HIV drugs receive salvage therapy, sometimes consisting of a large number of medications.

log

Short for logarithm, a scale of measurement often used when describing viral load. A one log change is a ten-fold change, such as from 100 to 10. A two-log change is a one hundred-fold change, such as from 1,000 to 10.

viral rebound

When a person on antiretroviral therapy (ART) has persistent, detectable levels of HIV in the blood after a period of undetectable levels. Causes of viral rebound can include drug resistance, poor adherence to an HIV treatment regimen or interrupting treatment.

CD4 cells

The primary white blood cells of the immune system, which signal to other immune system cells how and when to fight infections. HIV preferentially infects and destroys CD4 cells, which are also known as CD4+ T cells or T helper cells.

drug resistance

A drug-resistant HIV strain is one which is less susceptible to the effects of one or more anti-HIV drugs because of an accumulation of HIV mutations in its genotype. Resistance can be the result of a poor adherence to treatment or of transmission of an already resistant virus.

before starting a salvage regimen experienced the disappearance of

drug-resistant virus and a viral load fall of close to 3 log when they

eventually started a mega-HAART salvage regimen of three to eight drugs.

In contrast, those who maintained drug resistance despite a drug holiday

experienced an average viral load fall of 0.78 log, and only one had viral load

below 500 copies after six months, compared to 19 out of 24 of the

responders.

The report was presented to the Second International Workshop on Salvage

Therapy for HIV Infection, held in Toronto on May 19-21.

However, a drug holiday in this cohort was not without its risks, observed

Professor Brian Gazzard, commenting on median CD4 count falls of 89 cells/mm3

and a median viral load increase of 0.71 log. CD4 count declines of this

magnitude might be hazardous for individuals with low CD4 counts no longer

receiving prophylactic or maintenance treatment.

These findings support those of another non-randomised study of mega-HAART

salvage, conducted by the Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine. Dr Mike Youle told

the Salvage Workshop that the response to a salvage regimen of up to six drugs

was significantly influenced by the number of months an individual spent off

therapy before commencing the mega-HAART salvage regimen. This data was

previously presented to the RIGHT meeting in Washington DC, in April 1999.

Miller V et al. Mega-HAART, resistance and drug

holidays. Second International Workshop on Salvage Therapy for HIV Infection,

Toronto, abstract 030, 1999.

Youle M et al. Surrogate marker responses to

multi-drug combinations comprising hydroxyurea, efavirenz, double protease

inhibitors and nucleoside analogues in protease inhibitor failures. Second

International Workshop on Salvage Therapy for HIV Infection, Toronto, abstract

018, 1999.

 CD4 response on HAART predicts viral rebound

risk

The better the CD4 reponse on HAART, the lower

the risk of viral load rebound, according to a report by Dr Veronica Miller to

the Second International Workshop on Salvage Therapy for HIV Infection, held in

Toronto on May 19-21. Individuals who gained more than 200 cells within 36 weeks

of commencing a new regimen were half as likely to experience viral rebound as

people who experienced little or no change in their CD4 count (p = 0.003).

Baseline CD4 count also had a significant effect: people who started a new

regimen with CD4 counts below 100 were twice as likely to experience rebound as

those who started a new regimen whilst their CD4 count was above 500, and were

50% more likely to experience rebound compared to those with a CD4 around 300

cells.

No other factors (including baseline viral

load, time to suppression of viral load below 500 copies, treatment experience

or the number of new drugs started) proved so significant in determining the

risk of rebound, leading the authors to speculate that CD4 cells (and their

replenishment) may play a more significant role than previously thought in

controlling viremia in people on HAART.

Miller V et al. CD4 count: predictor of

duration of HAART-induced suppression of virus load. Second International

Workshop on Salvage Therapy for HIV Infection, Toronto, abstract 030,

1999.