Structured treatment interruptions: best results for people with low but detectable viral load

This article is more than 24 years old.

Stopping treatment when you have a low but detectable level of HIV may result in less serious viral rebound than stopping when you have undetectable viral load, according to the latest study from structured treatment interruption pioneer Franco Lori. His findings may also offer further evidence of a key role for hydroxyurea in managing structured treatment interruptions.

Reporting at the Seventh Conference on Retroviruses on Monday, Dr Lori presented results of a study which matched eight individuals on HAART with eight individuals taking ddI and hydroxyurea only. Whilst 6/8 of the HAART group had viral load below 50 copies at baseline, the average viral load in the hydroxyurea group was just above 500 copies, with some individuals above 1500 copies.

When the two groups stopped treatment, 5/8 HAART patients experienced viral load rebound of greater than 2 log to above 10,000 copies, but the hydroxyurea group only experienced a slight increase in viral load (to a an average level of 4,000 copies). Viral load then began to decline back towards baseline after four weeks off treatment, and none of the hydroxyurea group resumed treatment before the eight week interruption period was over.

Glossary

detectable viral load

When viral load is detectable, this indicates that HIV is replicating in the body. If the person is taking HIV treatment but their viral load is detectable, the treatment is not working properly. There may still be a risk of HIV transmission to sexual partners.

viraemia

The presence of virus in the blood.

 

log

Short for logarithm, a scale of measurement often used when describing viral load. A one log change is a ten-fold change, such as from 100 to 10. A two-log change is a one hundred-fold change, such as from 1,000 to 10.

matched

In a case-control study, a process to make the cases and the controls comparable with respect to extraneous factors. For example, each case is matched individually with a control subject on variables such as age, sex and HIV status. 

treatment interruption

Taking a planned break from HIV treatment, sometimes known as a ‘drugs holiday’. As this has been shown to lead to worse outcomes, treatment interruptions are not recommended. 

There was also a marked difference in CD4 responses during the off-treatment period. Whilst the HAART group experienced an average CD4 decline of nearly 200 cells during the eight week break, the average CD4 count of the hydroxyurea group remained stable.

When treatment was resumed, viral load fell in both groups, but remained detectable in the hydroxyurea group.

Click here to read stories posted throughout the week from the Seventh Retroviruses Conference

Click here for conference abstracts and video/audio feed of conference presentations.

Detailed summaries of each days' proceedings by leading clinicians are available at Medscape HIV/AIDS

Reference

Lori F et al. Control of viremia after structured treatment interruptions. Abstract 352, Seventh Conference on Retroviruses, San Francisco, 2000.