Antiretroviral treatment reduced the risk of HIV
transmission by 77% in serodiscordant couples in rural South Africa, a
population-based study carried out in the province of KwaZulu-Natal has shown. The
findings are published in advance online in Clinical
Infectious Diseases.
The investigators say that their findings provide a
real-life estimate of the impact of antiretroviral treatment on HIV
transmission under normal community conditions.
The study findings come from a longitudinal population-based
study that is being conducted in northern KwaZulu-Natal province by the Africa
Centre for Population Health. KwaZulu-Natal has the highest prevalence of HIV
in South Africa (29%) and HIV incidence remains high. Antiretroviral treatment
began to be provided in the province in 2004.
The investigators set out to establish whether HIV
transmission was being reduced by antiretroviral therapy in the KwaZulu-Natal
setting, and whether this reduction matched the impact of antiretroviral therapy on transmission in serodiscordant couples in the HPTN 052 randomised
clinical trial. In the carefully monitored conditions of the HPTN 052 trial,
where 89% of participants were virally suppressed, antiretroviral therapy
reduced transmission by 96%.
The analysis looked at the effect of antiretroviral
treatment on HIV transmission in serodiscordant couples between 2005 and 2013.
The analysis looked at both cohabiting and non-cohabiting couples. The
researchers identified cohabiting couples via demographic household
surveillance and ascertained HIV status data from surveillance data. Non-cohabiting
couples were identified by self-report.
The outcome of interest was HIV seroconversion during
longitudinal follow-up in previously HIV-negative partners of HIV-positive
individuals. HIV-negative individuals ceased being followed if the cohabiting
relationship ended. Antiretroviral treatment status of HIV-positive individuals
was ascertained from the records of the Hlabisa HIV Treatment and Care
Programme, which provides free access to antiretroviral treatment at 17 primary
health care clinics in the district.
Participants in the study were being tested regularly for
HIV during the follow-up period as part of the larger longitudinal population
study, on average around once a year (median interval 374 days interval between
tests).
A total of 17,106 adult individuals contributed 60,349
person-years of follow-up. The study identified 2029 HIV-negative people with a
cohabiting partner, of whom 196 had a partner with HIV infection. The remainder
had HIV-negative partners. Of the 196 partners with HIV, 20 were on
antiretroviral treatment at baseline and a further 56 began treatment during
the follow-up period.
Sixty-three per cent of participants were women. The median
age of participants was 33 years but the median age was substantially higher in
women than in men (36 years vs 28.5 years). Just over three per cent (3.3%) of
participants reported having more than one sexual partner in the previous 12
months; men reported multiple partners more frequently than women (7.2% vs
0.6%). Inconsistent condom use was reported by 37.4% of participants and was
more commonly reported by women (42.9% vs 29.1%).
Participants in the study were being tested regularly for
HIV during the follow-up period as part of the larger longitudinal population
study, on average around once a year (median interval 374 days interval between
tests).
Incidence was highest among people with an HIV-positive
partner not on antiretroviral therapy (5.6 per 100 person-years of follow up, 95% CI 3.5-8.4), compared
to 1.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.4-3.5) in people with an HIV-positive partner on therapy. Having a partner who was taking antiretroviral treatment reduced the
risk of acquiring HIV by 77% (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.80).
The investigators point out that drug stockouts and missed
clinic appointments were common at the primary health care clinics providing
antiretroviral treatment to the population who took part in the study,
suggesting that viral suppression may have been less than perfect among those
on treatment. Province-wide viral suppression among people receiving antiretroviral therapy prior
to 2010 had been reported as 77%.
Among people with HIV-negative partners HIV incidence was
0.3 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.2–0.5) and among people who reported not
being in a relationship incidence was 3.2 per 100 person-years (95% CI 3.1-3.4).
Overall incidence in the study population was 2.7 infections
per 100 person-years, compared to a maximum observed incidence of 6 infections
per 100 person-years in young women in the province previously reported by the
Africa Centre research group in the same rural population. These findings
suggest the very substantial role played by ongoing rather than casual
partnerships in HIV transmission in the district, and the need for both improved
awareness of HIV status and supported disclosure. Only 29% of participants were
previously aware of their HIV status at the time they were first tested, and
whereas in the HPTN 052 study all participants with HIV had disclosed their HIV
status to partners, in this study population disclosure was an individual
decision.
Both multiple partnerships and inconsistent condom use were
found to be independently associated with HIV acquisition.
The investigators caution that their findings may not be generalisable
to settings where the age structure is substantially different, for example
where serodiscordant partnerships are more prevalent among younger people.
Although a 77% reduction in HIV transmission is encouraging,
it is important to note that the incidence rate recorded among partners of
people on antiretroviral therapy was 1.4 infections per 100 person-years of
follow up. In a setting with very high incidence, such as KwaZulu-Natal, “additional
prevention interventions will likely be required to eliminate HIV transmission
in serodiscordant couples,” the authors conclude.
It is also important to note
that viral suppression in this community sample may have been considerably
lower than in the HPTN 052 study population, emphasising the importance of
maximising retention in care, minimising drug stockouts and ensuring that
people collect medication before previous prescriptions run out. Community-based
interventions that improve retention and support adherence are likely to pay
dividends in improving viral suppression and reducing HIV transmission.