A number of papers at the 19th
Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections presented advances in research on HIV-related brain impairment
and neurocognitive problems.
A couple of problems have dogged
research into HIV-related brain impairment. One is how to differentiate between
degrees of severity. Psychological tests can detect barely noticeable slowing
of performance but the high prevalence of this asymptomatic neurocognitive
impairment (ANI) overestimates the proportion of people with HIV who have real
difficulty with working or daily life. We also do not know to what extent ANI is
a predictor of the development of significant impairment, because some people
improve, especially with antiretroviral treatment (ART).
The other problem is how to link
neurological findings uncovered by brain scanning with the results of
psychological tests: some studies, while uncovering both changes in cognitive
performance and evidence of inflammation in the brain in HIV-positive people,
have found little statistical linkage between the two.
The cause of brain impairment also
remains uncertain: it is thought to be to do with HIV-induced inflammation of the
microglia, the cells that function as the brain’s immune system, but exact
causes remain elusive and recent studies have found that diabetes and fat accumulation are risk factors too. Finally, it remains unknown to what extent HIV-positive
people on ART will still be more likely than HIV-negative people to develop
dementia.
ANI
is very common: in the largest ongoing study of HIV and neurocognitive
problems, CHARTER, 52% of patients were found to have some degree of brain impairment,
but the majority was asymptomatic.
Does asymptomatic impairment matter?
One study from CHARTER presented at
CROI (Heaton) introduced new criteria to distinguish between ANI and mild
neurocognitive disorder (MND), which is impairment serious enough to interfere
with everyday living. In addition to the psychological tests that diagnose ANI,
the diagnosis of MND is based upon four additional tests: the patient’s own
assessment of their mental abilities and of their ability to perform household
tasks, and two assessments of work- and medication-based practical tasks – the
latter important because one of the most worrying implications of brain
impairment in people with HIV is the impact it may have on adherence.
The study looked at 387 CHARTER
patients and compared test results taken three years apart. At baseline, 64%
were defined as having normal functioning, 22% ANI and 15% MND.
People with either ANI or MND were
more likely to be female and non-white and people found to have ANI were significantly
more highly educated than patients either with normal functioning or MND – was
this because they were better able to prevent slowness in performance turning into
practical difficulties? There was little else to distinguish between people
with ANI and MND except that the latter were much more likely to have
co-morbidities, meaning anything from heart disease to hepatitis C.
At
follow-up, both the ANI and MND groups had similar declines in cognitive
function (an 11% and 13% decline in test scores respectively) but the
normal-functioning group had no decline. The CHARTER researchers comment that
“It has been suggested the ANI diagnosis is not valid, does not predict clinical
outcomes, and may be a statistical artefact” but that their studies find that
“ANI and MND are significant and comparable risk factors for cognitive
worsening over 18 to 42 months.”
Early infection and brain impairment
A pair of papers from researchers from
Yale, UCSF and North Carolina Universities contributed complementary
perspectives on neurocognitive processes in people in early HIV infection. They
found there is some evidence of brain damage from early infection and, in some
domains at least, this slowly worsens over time in people not taking ART but
can be reversed by antiretroviral therapy.
One study (Peterson) looked at 70
HIV-positive men who had been infected for an average of four months and gave
them the usual psychological tests at that point and regularly, on average, for
the next fifteen months. It found that overall functioning and in particular
motor skills were poorer than in the general population, though not by much:
20% of the patient group had scores more than one standard deviation below the
mean, when in the general population 16% would be expected.
Motor co-ordination and global
functioning continued to get slowly poorer in men not taking HIV therapy during
follow-up, though even off ART performance in other domains like memory improved,
suggesting that primary infection may cause brain damage in itself, as it does
to the immune cells of the gut. Motor performance stabilised in patients on ART
and other domains markedly improved. However, the researchers warn that “in
HIV-uninfected subjects, repeated testing might be expected to associate with
improved performance due to practice effects. These findings suggest that some
neurological dysfunction accrues prior to starting ART and may persist in the
setting of treatment, with implications for the impact of earlier initiation of
ART.”
This study was paralleled by one that
put people from the same cohort – though not the same people – into an MRI
scanner (Young). It measured the ratios of different metabolites (brain
chemicals) in 53 recently infected HIV-positive patients, 18 chronically infected
HIV subjects and 19 HIV-negative ones. It found a slow increase over 2.5 years
post-infection in the ratio of choline and myoinositol, two markers of brain
inflammation, to other brain chemicals in the HIV-positive subjects off
treatment. Choline in the brain is evidence of invasion by scavenging white
cells (macrophages) from the rest of the body while myoinositol is evidence of
inflammation in the microglia. This increase stopped as soon as subjects were
put on ART.
It found increases in inflammation
especially in the frontal white matter, the ‘wiring’ that connects together the
nerve cells used in the frontal lobes, which are where the brain does its
highest-level processing: decision-making, abstract thinking and understanding
other people.
Brain inflammation on long-term ART
Not
all people on ART improve and there is evidence of ongoing inflammation in some
parts of the brain in people on ART. In a study by Imperial College in London
(Garvey) seven people with chronic HIV infection (average time from infection nine years)
and undetectable viral loads, who had no neurological symptoms, were compared
with nine age- and ethnicity-matched HIV-negative controls by putting them into
a PET scanner; this detects a protein called PK11195, which specifically attaches
to inflamed microglia. The positive and negative subjects were also given the
same battery of psychological tests as above.
In this study, scans found, on
average, significantly greater signs of inflammation in a number of brain areas
in the HIV-positive cases versus the HIV-negative controls, but specifically in
the corpus callosum, which is the bridge of nerve fibres connecting the two
halves of the brain, the temporal and frontal lobes, and an area called the
cingulate cortex. The temporal lobe is part of the system for laying down
memories and the cingulate cortex is thought to be one of the seats of
consciousness: it connects the older, emotional parts of the brain with the
higher-order, thinking ones and governs the faculty called saliency, which is
the ability to notice when objects, thoughts or events are of particular
significance and need attention. These higher levels of inflammation were
correlated with deficits in executive function, the ability to juggle multiple
inputs and prioritise, though not with other psychological domains.
Cardiovascular risk and brain impairment
Finally, in addition to a poster (McCutchan) re-running the CHARTER findings that diabetes and waist circumference are strongly linked to neocoginitive decline, an Italian study (Colafigli) added more
weight to the evidence that cardiovascular disease is a risk factor for brain
impairment.
In this study, 269 people with HIV, 94% of them on ART, Were given
the usual psychological tests and also had a number of risks for
cardiovascular health measured, including tests for intima media thickness
(IMT, a measurement of the fatty plaque on arterial walls), and high-density
cholesterol (HDL-C or ‘good’ cholesterol). They then had the same tests done a
year later.
At baseline, 36% of subjects had some degree of
neurocognitive impairment, 33% had high IMT measurements and 35%
had a very high risk, according to the Framingham risk equation, of having a
cardiovascular event in the next ten years. A year later, 12% no longer had
cognitive impairment but 8% now had it who did not have it at baseline. Globally,
cognitive scores had actually gone up but long-term memory recall scores had
gone down. During the year there had been various changes, good and bad, to the
patients’ cardiovascular risk. On the one hand 7% had given up smoking and the
group had gained, on average, 67 more CD4 cells per mm3, but their
average HDL cholesterol had also fallen. After adjustment for CD4 count, age
and some other factors the only factor significantly associated with worse
neurocognitive performance was HDL-cholesterol.
What should we make
of all this? At a press conference Dr John Mellors, the CROI conference co-chair,
commented: “My fear is that in ten years’ time we’ll be able to eliminate HIV
in the rest of the body but will see an epidemic of dementia because our new
drugs won’t get to the HIV in the microglia.” We are getting a clearer picture
of what is going on in the brain but need drugs that can penetrate the
blood-brain barrier and dampen down the hypersensitive immune responses in the
brain and central nervous system.