Just over one in ten (12%) children
and adolescents living with HIV in Europe and Thailand take a break from antiretroviral
treatment, usually as a result of their own decision, findings from the
European Pregnancy and Paediatric HIV Cohort Collaboration, published in HIV Medicine, show.
In this pooled analysis from 19
cohorts from 17 countries, most children recovered well immunologically after
restarting treatment. However, younger age and higher nadir (lowest point) CD4
percentage during the treatment interruption predicted better immunological recovery.
Background
While lifelong antiretroviral
treatment (ART) is recommended for all with HIV infection, pill burden, side-effects and interference with everyday life affects long-term adherence,
especially among adolescents. Randomised controlled trials on the safety of
planned treatment interruptions in adults have found a higher incidence of
infections and death rates restarting treatment. Adult treatment guidelines do
not recommend treatment interruption.
Findings from the only two randomised
trials (PENTA
11 and CHER)
evaluating the consequences of planned treatment interruptions in children
suggest treatment interruptions may be more suitable for children than adults. The
immunological course of HIV infection in children differs from that in adults. In
the first years of life, children experience moderate immune suppression but
after starting antiretroviral treatment their immune response is stronger than
in adults.
In children with HIV under
five years of age, the CD4 percentage rather than CD4 count is used to evaluate
HIV progression and response to ART. The CD4 percentage is the percentage of
white blood cells that are CD4 cells.
Unplanned treatment
interruptions continue to occur, often in children and young people who have
irregular attendance, recent side-effects or treatment failure. This may mean
poorer virological and immunological status at the time of treatment
interruption compared to participants in experimental trials.
A French study
of 483 children found that after one year on ART, 7% had a treatment
interruption of three months or longer, with 30% having a treatment
interruption after five years on ART. Four years after treatment interruption
53% of children back on ART for six months or longer had a CD4 percentage greater than 25,
compared to 74% in a matched control group on continuous ART.
A study in
the United States of 72 children with an unplanned treatment interruption
found that those with the greatest gains in CD4 percentage while on treatment had the
greatest declines off treatment. CD4 recovery after restarting treatment was
not investigated.
This study
The identification of
children and adolescents at risk of poor recovery is important for the timely
restart of treatment. The researchers therefore aimed to investigate factors
that might predict improved immunological recovery after restarting treatment. They
hypothesised that these may include age and nadir CD4%.
Data from paediatric
HIV-positive cohorts were pooled. Children under 18 years of age on ART for
more than six months before a treatment interruption of 30 or more days were
included. CD4 percentage at the restart of ART and in the long-term (up to 24
months after restarting ART) after the first treatment interruption was
modelled.
From a total of 7358 children
on ART, 779 with at least one treatment interruption were included in the
analysis.
Unplanned treatment interruptions continue to
occur in children and young people.
The median age at first
treatment interruption was 10.1 years (IQR: 6.4-13.6) after being on ART for
5.5 years. The median treatment interruption was 9.0 months (IQR: 3.5-22.5).
The primary reason for
treatment interruption was the patient’s decision and/or non-compliance (49%),
followed by treatment failure (22%), doctor’s decision (17%) and side-effects
(9%).
A third had more than one
treatment interruption. The second, third and fourth treatment interruptions happened
at 13.8, 14.8 and 15.8 years of age, respectively.
The children had a relatively
good immunological status at the first treatment interruption with a mean CD4 percentage
of 27.3% (standard deviation 11%). However, only 27% had a suppressed viral
load (< 400 copies/mL).
At the end of treatment
interruption the mean CD4 percentage was 19.2% (95% CI: 18.3-20.1%). Two years after
restarting ART, it rose to 27.1% (95% CI: 26.2-27.9%), therefore reaching the
pre-treatment interruption value, with half the increase in the first six
months.
This may support findings
from the CHER and PENTA 11 trials suggesting that treatment interruption may be
a safe choice with regular CD4 monitoring, even if not routinely recommendable.
However, multivariable
analysis from this real-world setting shows several factors affecting recovery
after treatment interruption.
Children under three years of
age at the first treatment interruption had the highest CD percentage at restart of
treatment and in the long-term (up to 24 months). After adjusting for CD4 percentage
during treatment interruption, CD4 percentage recovery was highest in the youngest
children, suggesting that older children have a decreased ability to
reconstitute CD4 cells.
Long-term CD4 percentage
recovery after restarting ART was highest among those with a treatment
interruption of less than three months, those who restarted ART after the year
2000 and those with a CD4 percentage nadir of 25% or more (all, p < 0.001).
In general, a lower CD4 percentage
during the treatment interruption was associated with poorer immunological
recovery after restarting and in the long term. Nonetheless, children with a
CD4 percentage nadir < 15% during treatment interruption whose viral load had
previously been suppressed reached a better long term CD4 percentage than those with a
detectable viral load. Viral load had no effect on recovery in children with CD4 percentage nadir ≥ 25%.
The authors caution that while
young children show potential for good recovery, CD4 monitoring during
treatment interruption is critical so that treatment is restarted before there
are any significant decreases in CD4 cell count.