HIV PrEP also prevents hepatitis B – and works better than the hepatitis B vaccine

Image: nito/Shutterstock.com

A retrospective cohort study of gay and bisexual men attending sexual health clinics in Japan shows that taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) not only protects against HIV but also against infection with hepatitis B, reducing the risk of it nearly tenfold. The study was presented at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2020).

This is a considerably greater risk reduction than that provided by getting vaccinated against hepatitis B. However, the researchers emphasised that hepatitis B vaccination was still important for people at risk as it prevented half of infections and even when it did not prevent infection, it reduced hepatitis B symptoms to almost nothing.

PrEP involves two antiretroviral drugs: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine, both of which are active against HIV and also hepatitis B. A previous study in Japan had found that people with HIV who were prescribed either tenofovir or lamivudine – usually both – as part of their antiretroviral therapy (ART) had one-tenth of the risk of hepatitis B infection than people not on ART, and one-eighth of the risk of those taking ART that did not feature either of those drugs (see also this Dutch study).

Glossary

chlamydia

Chlamydia is a common sexually transmitted infection, caused by bacteria called Chlamydia trachomatis. Women can get chlamydia in the cervix, rectum, or throat. Men can get chlamydia in the urethra (inside the penis), rectum, or throat. Chlamydia is treated with antibiotics.

exclusion criteria

Defines who cannot take part in a research study. Eligibility criteria may include disease type and stage, other medical conditions, previous treatment history, age, and gender. For example, many trials exclude women who are pregnant, to avoid any possible danger to a baby, or people who are taking a drug that might interact with the treatment being studied.

statistical significance

Statistical tests are used to judge whether the results of a study could be due to chance and would not be confirmed if the study was repeated. If result is probably not due to chance, the results are ‘statistically significant’. 

syphilis

A sexually transmitted infection caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum. Transmission can occur by direct contact with a syphilis sore during vaginal, anal, or oral sex. Sores may be found around the penis, vagina, or anus, or in the rectum, on the lips, or in the mouth, but syphilis is often asymptomatic. It can spread from an infected mother to her unborn baby.

multivariate analysis

An extension of multivariable analysis that is used to model two or more outcomes at the same time.

It was also clear that it was the tenofovir that was curbing infections, as 50% of the hepatitis B viruses in people who were taking lamivudine had resistance to that drug, compared to 7% in those who were not taking it, so in itself, it was clearly failing to stop infections (lamivudine is very similar to emtricitabine, the drug most often used alongside tenofovir in PrEP).

The study by Dr Daisuke Mizushima and colleagues from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Tokyo was therefore designed to see if the same applied to HIV-negative men taking PrEP. They looked retrospectively at data on 827 gay and bisexual men attending clinics between January 2018 and September 2019. Just over a quarter of them (211 men) were already positive for antibodies to both hepatitis B surface and hepatitis B core antigens; this indicated that they had had hepatitis B infection in the past and were now immune to it. They were excluded from the study. Twenty-five men (3%) were HIV-positive and were also excluded.

Of the remaining 591 men, 148 (25%) took PrEP for part or all of the follow-up period. PrEP was being supplied for free to some of them as part of a 120-strong trial, and others were buying it privately and importing it. They attended three-monthly appointments and were screened for HIV and acute hepatitis B infection, and also for gonorrhoea, chlamydia and syphilis.

The men were on average 34.5 years old, with PrEP takers a little older at 36.7. By self-report, 38.7% had been vaccinated against hepatitis B and 31.6% had evidence of this in the form of being positive for antibodies to the hepatitis B surface antigen, but not to the core antigen, which indicates previous vaccination.

One-third were diagnosed with gonorrhoea and/or chlamydia at baseline, and 5.3% with active syphilis. Only one person had hepatitis C.

There were 14 new hepatitis B infections in men not taking PrEP, but only one in a man taking PrEP. The overall annual incidence of hepatitis B was 3.57%. Annual incidence rates in PrEP-takers and non-takers were not calculated because people started PrEP both before and during the follow-up study, so follow-up time on PrEP could not be calculated, but the hazard ratio – the risk of acquiring hepatitis B in PrEP-takers compared to the risk in non-takers – was 0.114, in other words an 88.6% reduction in the likelihood of acquiring hepatitis B. Multivariate analysis, accounting for factors like STIs that indicated more at-risk sexual encounters, hardly altered this reduction in the risk of hepatitis B (87.7% reduction).

This reduction in the hepatitis B infection rate was far greater than the reduction in people who had been vaccinated against hepatitis B. This only halved hepatitis B incidence (49.5% reduction) and this reduction was in fact not statistically significant.

The only other factor that neared statistical significance were STIs; men with chlamydia or gonorrhoea at baseline were 2.74 times more likely to acquire hepatitis B.

Seven of the 15 people who caught hepatitis B were entirely asymptomatic – it was only detected via lab tests – and this included all three people who acquired hepatitis B despite having had the hepatitis B vaccine. This leads the researchers to emphasise that even if the hepatitis B vaccine only cuts the risk of infection in half, it still has a valuable role as it may reduce the chances of a severe infection and of hepatitis B becoming chronic. The one person on PrEP who caught hepatitis B had not been vaccinated, and did get symptoms.

References

Mizushima D et al. Prophylactic effect of PrEP against HBV infection among MSM. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, abstract 1025, March 2020.

View the abstract on the conference website.

View the poster on the conference website.

Related topics