A number of presentations at the 2016 HIV Research for
Prevention Conference (HIVR4P) in Chicago looked at the influence vaginal
bacteria have on HIV susceptibility, and one presentation found that vaginal
bacteria may have profound effects on the levels of certain drugs used as
microbicides – but not on others.
A poster at the conference also looked at the bacteria in
the rectum in gay men and found a correlation between having had condomless anal
sex and changes in the predominant bacterial species that may similarly
increase susceptibility to HIV infection.
Bacterial vaginosis: how it alters HIV susceptibility and PrEP efficacy
Bacterial
vaginosis is a condition in which acid-loving aerobic (oxygen-using)
bacteria such as Lactobacillus are
largely replaced by species such as Gardnerella
which are anaerobic. It has for a
number of years been associated both with higher
rates of HIV acquisition and transmission
in women. Other studies have suggested that it is not so much that the
anaerobic bacteria are inflammatory but that Lactobacillus is protective.
Irene Xie of Canada’s Public Health Agency told the
conference that there was considerably more bacterial vaginosis in women in
surveys from Africa than from North America. In women at low risk of HIV from
the US and Canada, Lactobacillus species
comprised two-thirds of vaginal flora. In surveys of women from Africa, they only comprised about one-third, with about two-thirds various anaerobic species,
especially Gardnerella and Prevotella. These are average proportions; in fact, women tended to
fall into two distinct categories, those without bacterial vaginosis and those
with, with quite separate bacterial populations, and no in-between states.
The anaerobic and aerobic bacteria in turn stimulated quite different
sets of inflammatory and skin-regeneration genes in the vaginal mucosa (lining),
which in turn means that whereas Lactobacillus
species actually promote wound healing, lesions heal 25% more slowly where Gardnerella is the main species. This is
why bacterial vaginosis is associated with higher HIV infection and transmission
rates. Interestingly, some injectable contraceptives disrupt the healing of the
mucosa through a similar mechanism.
As
also reported at this year’s International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2016), vaginal
bacteria can also have an effect on drug concentrations when they are used in
microbicides. However here it is women who do not have bacterial vaginosis who are in danger of low drug levels.
The drugs tenofovir and dapivirine, used in gels and rings, are efficiently
absorbed by Lactobacillus crispatus,
the most common species, resulting in drug concentrations in vaginal tissues ten
times lower in women where this species predominates.
Although this problem can be overcome by ensuring high
enough levels in the vagina itself, it could result in loss of efficacy – and may
explain some infections – in situations where microbicides are used
intermittently. The prodrugs of tenofovir which are taken orally, tenofovir
disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are not absorbed, so
should maybe be considered for use in microbicides too.
Condomless receptive anal sex and changes in the rectal bacterial population in gay men
If the bacterial populations in the vagina form an
established though still-growing area of research, research into rectal
bacteria, and whether differences in them also change inflammation and susceptibility to
HIV via anal sex, is almost new territory.
One poster looked at rectal bacteria in gay men. It enrolled
41 gay men who had condomless anal sex and 21 men in a control group who had
never had anal sex at all, and surveyed their rectal bacteria. In the case of
the men who had anal sex, it took samples for analysis at two time points; one
more than three days after the last anal sex, and then one within four hours of
it.
The researchers found that men who had condomless receptive
anal intercourse tended to have higher levels of one bacterium, Prevotella, that is also higher in women
with bacterial vaginosis. Controls had, instead, other species such as Bacteroides.
Similarly to the picture in the vagina, Prevotella also upregulates the activity of inflammatory genes in rectal
tissue. The researchers hypothesise that the alkalinity of semen and
micro-trauma caused by anal sex may both increase rectal inflammation directly
and also cause inflammation by the overgrowth of anaerobic species such as Prevotella. The alkalinity of sperm also
tips the environment against Lactobacillus
in women.
It is important to emphasise firstly that other factors may
also influence the vaginal and rectal flora: for instance, a western diet high
in protein tends to be associated with a higher proportion of Bacteroides in the rectum and a diet high
in carbohydrates and fibre more typical of poorer countries with more Prevotella. Also, the genetic probes
used to find bacteria are relatively insensitive and may miss minority species,
and the correlation of genetic fingerprinting techniques with the more traditional
Nugent score, which counts bacterial species on slides, is poor.
Nonetheless, research into vaginal and rectal flora is a
growing area of HIV and STI prevention work, and one which may guide
microbicide development and treatments in the future.