South Africa exceeded
national targets for new patients starting antiretroviral treatment (ART) by around
50% between 2007 and 2011
– achieving treatment coverage of close to 80% of eligible
adults
– according to new research carried out by Dr Leigh F Johnson, actuarial
scientist at the University of Cape Town, published in the March issue of The Southern African Journal of Medicine.
From mid-2004 to mid-2011, the
total numbers of people receiving ART increased from 47,500 (95% CI:
42,900
to 51,800) to 1.79 million people (95% CI: 1.65 to 1.93 million). The latter
figure represents close to 80% of adult treatment coverage, according to
eligibility criteria in use during this period (CD4 cell counts under 200
cells/mm3). Using current South African CD4 cell count eligibility criteria
(under 350 cells/mm3), coverage achieved decreases to 52% (95% CI:
46-57%).
While the
targets were still exceeded, children and men started ART at considerably lower ratios
than women.
Women accounted for 61%, men
31% and children 8% of the total.
Effective HIV treatment significantly reduces illness and death resulting from HIV, as well as onward transmission of HIV. Evaluating
the effectiveness of HIV treatment and prevention programmes requires
monitoring access to ART.
Previous monitoring
assessments have shown a dramatic increase in access to ART in South Africa. While
these assessments have suggested South Africa was on track to meet the targets
of its HIV & AIDS & STI National Strategic Plan 2007-2011 (the NSP), no formal assessment has been made, Dr Johnson adds.
Indeed, his study shows just
how difficult it is to be certain about the exact level of ART coverage being
achieved in South Africa. The study finds that the total number of people receiving
treatment lies somewhere between 1.65 and 1.93 million – a variation of 300,000
people.
Dr Johnson cites the
challenges associated with monitoring access to ART in South Africa:
Understanding
public sector statistics is complicated by a change in reporting in late 2009
from cumulative numbers on ART to those starting ART.
There
has been no routine collection, nor reporting, of statistics from disease
management programmes or those run by non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
Information
about age and gender is lacking; of particular concern since the rates of men
starting ART may be lower than among women.
Uncertainties
about how ‘treatment need’ is defined – the denominator used to estimate ART
coverage. Mathematical models have been used to estimate numbers of HIV-positive
individuals with CD4 counts below different thresholds. Yet the rates of CD4
cell count decline assumed in these models and how they may differ between
populations are unclear.
Cross-sectional
measures may not account for recent programme performance.
ART data were collected from
public and private ART providers. Independent demographic project models were
used to assess HIV incidence estimates. To estimate the numbers of adults
needing ART, a model was developed to simulate population growth over time, HIV
incidence and estimated rates of progression (through CD4 decline), and fitted to
local CD4 and HIV prevalence data.
Extraordinary progress has
been made in South Africa in the roll out of ART since 2004 and the start of
the public sector ART programme. The NSP 2007-2011 targets have been far exceeded
and include a 32% reduction in unmet need for ART.
Of the 1.79 million people accessing treatment in 2011, 85% received ART through the public sector, 11% through disease
management programmes in the private sector, and 4% through community treatment
programmes run by NGOs.
The two provinces of KwaZulu
Natal and Gauteng accounted for 56% of all those receiving ART.
Dr Johnson suggests that the
lower rate of men starting ART compared to women may be linked to gender differences
in health-seeking behaviours or the perception that men who seek care are
‘weak’. Or, he suggests, higher rates of women starting ART may be linked to
higher rates of HIV diagnosis through antenatal care. He suggests that lower
access rates in children may reflect lower rates of testing but cautions against
making a comparison with adult measures of access since the course of the
illness differs considerably.
The author had limited
success in validating the reported ART programme statistics. Crude estimates of
numbers of public sector patients on treatment in each quarter were calculated
according to lamivudine (3TC, Epivir) sales figures from Aspen Pharmacare, which supplied 80%
of lamivudine to the public sector until recently. While they did not differ
significantly from the model estimates until the end of 2008, and again from October
2009 until March 2010, they were significantly lower than model estimates from
January to September 2009.
Assuming patients on ART went
for viral load testing twice a year, the numbers of viral load tests undertaken
by the National Laboratory Service for public sector clinics were used to get a
theoretical estimate of the numbers receiving ART. The estimates were both higher
and lower than the model estimates, depending on the time period looked at.
Similarly, the model estimate
of the proportion of 18 to 45 year-olds on ART at mid-2008 was significantly lower
than the corresponding proportion estimated in the 2008 Human Sciences Research
Council Survey (HSRC).
High levels of testing and
counselling and increased capacity to deliver ART are needed if the ambitious
NSP 2012-2016 ART enrolment targets (80% of those considered to be in 'new need' in that year, and 80%
of the unmet need from previous years) are to be met and successfully monitored,
writes Dr Johnson.
Dr Johnson concludes with the hope that the proposed
measures to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of South Africa’s ART
programme, which include a single patient identifier in the health sector and a
single registry at the primary level, “will lead to
greater precision in estimating future ART coverage, as well as a deeper
understanding of the factors determining access to and retention in care”.