A study of gay men in Ireland that has investigated the prevalence of infection
with human papillomavirus (HPV), some types of which cause genital warts
and cervical, anal and oral cancers, concludes that 47% of HIV-positive and 64%
of HIV-negative gay men would benefit from being given one of the HPV vaccines against
the two most common cancer-causing types.
Even though a much higher proportion of gay men than the
general public are already infected with the strains of HPV most associated with cancer, and
would not therefore benefit from a vaccine, they are still in the minority: and
the fact that anal cancer is 17-35 times more common in gay men than the
general public, and 35-70 times more common in HIV-positive gay men, makes
vaccination with the HPV vaccines Cervarix
(which offers near-100% protection against
the two most common cancer-causing types of HPV) or Gardasil (which also offers 100% protection against the two most
common wart-causing types) still worthwhile.
The study
Researchers looked at HPV infection among 194 men who have
sex with men who were recruited at GUIDE, the gay men’s health clinic at St
James’s Hospital in Dublin, and the Gay Men’s Health Services (GMHS), a
community-based gay men’s sexual health clinic, in April and May 2012. The
cohort was split almost evenly between HIV-positive men (99) and HIV-negative
men (95).
The average age of the cohort was 36, with the HIV-positive
men older, on average, than the HIV-negative ones (40 versus 32). Three-quarters
of the men were born in Ireland; the rest were split more or less evenly
between western Europeans, eastern Europeans and men from the rest of the
world.
In terms of sexual risk behaviour, there was almost no difference related to HIV status in
the average number of partners in the last year (seven in HIV-positive and
eight in HIV-negative men) or in condom use (43% of HIV-positive and 40% of
HIV-negative men said they had always used condoms in the past year). Twelve of the
HIV-positive men said they had had no sex at all in the previous year compared
with only two of the HIV-negative men, and yet nine of these 14 had detectable
HPV infection, seven with cancer-causing types.
(In the natural history of HPV infection, the body mounts an
immune response to the virus that eventually results in the infection
disappearing over a period from months to years: one reason HIV-positive people (not
just gay men) have more anal and cervical cancer is because it takes longer for
them to eliminate HPV from their system.)
Despite having slightly lower HIV risk behaviour, the
HIV-positive men were more likely to have had a previous sexually transmitted infection
(STI) diagnosed (70%) than the HIV-negative men (44%), though this could be partly
influenced by age. Thirty-nine per cent of the HIV-positive men had had visible
anal warts before compared with 14% of the HIV-negative men.
The cross-sectional study found that a majority (69%) of men
had HPV infection with at least one type: 77% of the HIV-positive men and 61%
of the HIV-negative men.
However, only a minority of men had infection with the two
most common and virulent cancer-causing types, HPV16 and HPV18. Forty-seven per
cent of the HIV-positive and 36% of the HIV-negative men had infection with
either HPV16, HPV18, or both, or another cancer-causing type called HPV31,
which is not covered specifically by the HPV vaccines, though they have some
efficacy against it. Even those infected with one cancer-causing HPV type could
benefit marginally from the HPV vaccine and while 12% of the HIV-positive men
had both types 16 and 18, none of the HIV-negative men did.
The likelihood of having a cancer-causing type of HPV rose
with age, with a quarter of 17 to 24-year olds having HPV 16, 18 or 31 but a
half of men over 35. The same was not true of all HPVs including the wart-forming types: these were, in fact, most
common in the youngest age group.
The likelihood of having both any HPV and cancer-causing
types was unsurprisingly higher in men with a previous STI diagnosis or who had
had anal warts. The likelihood was slightly higher in men who used condoms
irregularly or never, compared with men who used them always: 36% of men who
always used condoms had at least one cancer-causing HPV variety, 44% who sometimes
used condoms and 56% of the small number of individuals who never did, but
this trend was not statistically
significant (p = 0.366). There was no association between HPV infection and type
of sex: men who only had oral sex were as likely to have HPV as men who only
had anal sex.
Implications
This study had a few limitations, the main one of which is
that HPV infection rates observed in Dublin may not be generalisable to other
areas. Nonetheless, where it had been previously assumed that HPV infection
among sexually active gay men and in particular HIV-positive men was so universal
as to make vaccinating them pointless,
this study implies that at least half of HIV-positive gay men and two-thirds of
HIV-negative gay men could benefit from it.
The study has appeared shortly before the UK government’s Joint
Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation meets on Monday 29 September, as
reported by the BBC, to consider whether adolescent boys, gay men or both should
receive the HPV vaccine.
Cervarix was recommended
for girls aged 12-13 plus ‘catch-up’ vaccinations for older women six years ago,
and Gardasil replaced it in 2012. The
presumption was that reducing HPV infection in women would also reduce it in
men, but this does not apply to men who have sex with men. A number of countries
already recommend the HPV vaccine for boys including the USA, which licensed Gardasil in young men in 2010.
HPV now causes at least 5% of the world’s cancers and it is
estimated that if boys were vaccinated, the rate of anal cancer would fall by
60%.
The authors comment “Emerging patterns of HPV-related
disease strengthen the call for universal vaccination of boys and girls with
consideration of catch-up and targeted vaccination of high-risk groups such as
MSM [men who have sex with men] and those with HIV infection.”