It’s
feasible and safe for a team of five to circumcise ten men in an hour,
researchers told the Eighteenth International AIDS Conference in Vienna on Tuesday. To
achieve this, tasks are shared between doctors and nurses, and the procedures
have been refined to use time as efficiently as possible.
The
conference heard the experiences of people working in Orange Farm, South Africa
(where the first randomised controlled trial demonstrating circumcision’s impact
on HIV infection was carried out); Kenya (including the city of Kisumu, where a
circumcision trial took place); and in Zimbabwe.
Speakers
from Orange Farm and Kenya
emphasised the importance of community engagement and communication. Much of
this had already begun as part of the research trials, but roll-out in Orange
Farm has been supported by visits to each household in the area, radio shows,
and separate meetings for men and women. In the Kenyan experience, women play
an influential role in men’s decisions about circumcision and should be a
priority audience for communications.
Teenagers have been much
keener to take up the offer than men over the age of 25
Kenya has rolled circumcision out
nationally (the largest programme in Africa), requiring engagement with a
large number of political, community and social leaders. There has been
high-level political support and the involvement of a wide range of government
departments and professional bodies.
The Kenyan
programme aims to achieve significant population coverage quickly in order to
reduce HIV incidence. Starting in October 2008, over 130,000 have been
circumcised, with the aim of reaching 860,000 by 2013. Teenagers have been much
keener to take up the offer than men over the age of 25.
Circumcision
is not a national priority for South Africa,
but the clinic in the township
of Orange Farm offers
free medical circumcision to all male residents aged 15 or over. Between January 2008 and November 2009, 14,011 men took up the offer, which is equivalent to 39% of men
in the community.
There were
no permanent injuries or deaths, but 1.8% had some adverse events (for example,
bleeding). A satisfaction survey of over 1000 men found that 92% rated the
service as good or very good.
Although
the researchers say that up to 150 men can be circumcised in a day, the monthly
average is in fact 740. These high rates were achieved by working in three
teams, each composed of one medical circumciser and five nurses.
The
practical details of this kind of team working were described in more detail by
Karin Hatzold, based on her experience in Zimbabwe. The goal there is to
circumcise 80% of men aged 15 to 29
– in other words, 1.3 million men.
In an
open-plan operating room, divided by curtains, a team of five works on the
circumcisions of four men at a time. This reduces idle time between procedures
(for example, while the local anaesthetic is taking effect) and allows staff to
move quickly from one patient to another and communicate easily with each
other.
As many
tasks as possible are delegated to nurses. However, under Zimbabwean law the
circumcision itself must be performed by a doctor, so the team is made up of
two doctors and three nurses.
The
forceps-guided method is used, which the researchers say is the quickest and easiest
to learn and use. Wounds are sealed with diathermy (a procedure using
electrical heat) rather than stitches. Most of the equipment used is
disposable.
One team
can now perform between eight and ten circumcisions an hour, rather than one or
two before the new systems were introduced. The time the doctor spends on a man
has reduced from 25 to 30 minutes to 7 to 10 minutes.
Hatzold was
asked if there are any downsides to these procedures. She said that the number
of side effects has not increased. On the other hand, the work can be tiring and
repetitive. Moreover, to return to the issue of community engagement, the
system can only work efficiently if there are enough men who want to be
circumcised.