- Home
- News
- Treatment & Care
- HIV Worldwide
- Living with HIV
- Preventing HIV
- Organisations
- HIV Basics
- About Us
- HATIP #61, 19th January, 2006
- HATIP #62, 31st January, 2006
- HATIP #63, 17th February, 2006
- HATIP #64, 1st March, 2006
- HATIP #65, 16th March, 2006
- HATIP #66, 31st March, 2006
- HATIP #67, 13th April, 2006
- HATIP #68, 23rd May, 2006
- HATIP #69, 20th June, 2006
- HATIP #70, 14th July, 2006
- HATIP #71, 27th July, 2006
- HATIP #72, 3rd August, 2006
- HATIP #73, 10th August, 2006
- HATIP #74, 12th September, 2006
- HATIP #75, 21st September 2006
- HATIP #76, 20th October 2006
- HATIP #77, 1st November 2006
- HATIP #78, 28th November 2006
- HATIP #79, 19th December 2006
feedback
Give us your views on our work
HATIP #68, 23rd May, 2006
Main article: Integrating prevention research into the provision of HIV care
By Theo Smart
“We are in a situation, especially in KwaZulu Natal, that we cannot ignore treatment and care of these women. I feel that there is a responsibility of [HIV prevention] trials sponsors and researchers to facilitate access to HIV-related care. It needs to be done and we need to do something about it,” said Professor Gita Ramjee at the recent Microbicides 2006 conference during a panel discussion on setting standards of care for participants in HIV prevention research trials. Prof. Ramjee is the Director of the HIV Prevention Research Unit (HPRU) of the South African Medical Research Council (MRC) and she was a co-chair of the Microbicides 2006 conference.
Although firmly resolved to help women access care if they screen out of prevention studies because they are already HIV-positive or if they seroconvert during the studies, Prof. Ramjee and other panel members stressed that the provision of HIV care is not a exercise that researchers and trial sponsors should be expected to do alone — rather they should work with and provide additional capacity to the local scale-up of HIV treatment and care. Nevertheless, this represents a significant evolution over the thinking that doomed a couple of earlier prevention studies (see below).
One of the triumphs of the Microbicide 2006 meeting is that researchers demonstrated that the inclusion of the community and the provision of standard of care treatment to participants in prevention studies is a win-win scenario.
“Facilitation is the key word. And the model I use is to integrate prevention, treatment and care,” said Prof. Ramjee.
The potential role that prevention research could play in the scale up of treatment and care is considerable. Prevention research by definition requires voluntary testing and counselling and screening of sexually transmitted infections and so can add significantly to laboratory and testing capacity.
It may also feed very large numbers of patients into HIV treatment and care clinics. Globally, ongoing microbicide research trials are enrolling over 30,000 participants, and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PREP) studies will also involve thousands of patients. Some studies slated to open in the next year or so, such as the tenofovir gel efficacy studies, will involve at least 10,000 participants each — and possibly many more if sample sizes in the ongoing clinical trials are determined to be too small (and there is a good possibility of this, see http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/DB107459-36CD-4868-9F24-0F36C4B00B88.asp)
The number of people who screen for these studies is actually much higher than the number needed for enrollment and many screen out because they are HIV-positive (in rates similar to the local HIV prevalence). In the absence of routine HIV testing or dramatically increased uptake of VCT, prevention studies could represent one of the larger sources of potential participants for scaling up HIV programmes. In addition, these individuals could also serve as index cases for partners and/or children who may also need HIV care.
But until only recently, the prospects appeared limited for integrating HIV prevention research into HIV treatment programmes. This was largely because of setbacks — and missteps — in earlier prevention research that may have set back the quest to find an effective prevention technique (besides condoms) by years.
Tenofovir’s trials and tribulations
Daily oral tenofovir (as PREP) was one of the first products to move into large-scale efficacy studies for the prevention of HIV. But in 2004 and 2005, several of the studies were derailed largely due to pressure from ACT UP Paris and in some cases, local organisations that claimed that the trials were unethical. Ultimately, the choice of whether this study or any study should continue should be left up to the community in which it is being performed — as long as that community is speaking with a unified voice.
In the case of the tenofovir studies, the story is somewhat mixed. http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/3BAF85DA-3C18-49F1-A8A1-49F37C94F8D7.asp, http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/53066193-F3CA-4B1A-8E1E-7B99A7698E76.asp, http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/deab5309-e626-476e-8df8-50d836b26d66.asp.
In general, activists felt that the community had not been adequately involved in the preparation, design and implementation of the tenofovir trials — and to some extent the problems encountered by the trials are evidence of this. The activists also had several specific complaints especially concerning the standard of care for prevention being offered in the studies and the provisions for standard of care treatment during and after the study.
Activists had the right to be concerned about the adequacy of prevention services offered participants in these studies, however, the issues can be complex. The activists sited Guideline 29 of the Helsinki Declaration on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (http://www.wma.net/e/policy/pdf/17c.pdf), which states that new products should be tested against the best treatment or prophylactic interventions available. In the case of HIV prevention, this would clearly include counselling and condoms as well as clean needles.
For example, one complaint, about a jeopardised PREP study in injection drug users (IDUs) in Thailand, is that the study does not provide clean needles to the participants. In this case, the IDU activists are absolutely right — clean needle distribution would markedly reduce HIV transmission in the study population, however, US government policy currently bars federally funded organisations (such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) from supporting needle exchange.
This is a bad policy, and yet, it does not necessarily follow that the trial should be discontinued. One of the goals of the Helsinki Declaration is to try avoid modern day Tuskeegee experiments but there is a danger that if guideline 29 were to be interpreted too strictly, trials would be never be able to generate results that are applicable to real world settings. The best way to get useful results is to use a control arm that matches actual practice in the community — although in this case, the IDU community clearly wants the freedom to do more to protect themselves (to access clean needles without police harassment).
But this isn’t always the case. For example, ACT UP Paris complained that the tenofovir studies in Cameroon did not provide female condoms. And indeed, female condoms could reduce transmission and supplying them would optimise the standard of care for prevention in the trial. However, even though acceptability of female condoms was reportedly high in clinical trials, their real world uptake has been very limited perhaps, as mentioned by participants in one Population Council study, because it takes too long to insert (destroying spontaneity), looks ugly and squeaks noisily during sex. Although lowering the price and increased social marketing have led more people to try the product, these efforts have had no impact on increasing consistent use.
Holding up a trial because it does not offer a prevention intervention which is not in widespread use would seem not to be in the best interest of people. And if you took this approach (requiring the highest standard of care in the prevention control arm) to its logical conclusion, then prevention studies would have to get women to bring in their male partners for circumcision -- as this has also been shown to reduce HIV acquisition in the man, and transmission of HIV to his partner (see http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/d775d204-7155-4cdf-acb5-8caa1c6730fa.asp, and http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/37A87885-0A35-431B-8C8C-6D7A4B1BB9F6.asp.)
But this would be unworkable.
ACT UP Paris also had another related complaint — that there were too few prevention counsellors in the Cameroon study — arguing that one doctor and five counsellors to 400 women was an unacceptably low ratio. (see http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/53066193-F3CA-4B1A-8E1E-7B99A7698E76.asp)
But just how many counsellors and how much counselling is necessary? Five full-time counsellors to 400 people is a lot better than many communities have. That’s about two hours of prevention counselling and support for each person per month; certainly much more than the participants would receive outside of the trial.
On top of this, at their monthly clinic visits participants would have received free condoms, repeated tests for hepatitis and for HIV (in itself, a pretty strong incentive to practice safer sex) and free treatment for sexually transmitted infections. In reality, anyone participating in this study would have received prevention that was better than in the real world treatment. Instead, the study in Cameroon was shut down, and those people got nothing.
With the benefit of hindsight, trials presented at Microbicide 2006 suggest that activist concerns about inadequate prevention interventions were unwarranted. For example, participation in a prevention trial in Ghana (of the microbicide Savvy, see http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/E31C54A1-F80E-4155-A2CB-0852AF6A04B6.asp), which offered the same standard of care interventions that were being offered in Cameroon, resulted in extremely low seroconversion rates of ~0.9-1.0 in both the placebo and Savvy arm — and many other trials are also observed lower than expected rates of transmission (Link) .
Unfortunately, misinformation about the study in Cameroon and oral tenofovir received considerable press in in sub-Saharan Africa and did immeasurable harm beyond the permanent closure of the trials. Many people are now convinced that the investigators were trying to give the participants HIV, and that the tenofovir pills — or even microbicides that Western investigators now want to study in them — might actually contain HIV.
Even on the other side of the continent, in Uganda, activist Miriam Katende of TASO said during the panel discussion on standard of care, the first thing that people want to know about a study is “is the product free of HIV.” It has affected trust, and people in Katende’s community are worried about who is conducting trial “Who is administering the product, and this matters a lot. Where is this person coming from? Is he coming from the North or the South?” she said.
But the other major concern for the activists and the major reason for the suspension of the tenofovir trials was the absence of a system to guarantee long term provision of ART to those who seroconverted during the trial (in every setting). And the investigators and study sponsors didn’t really have a good answer.
One of the difficulties for the tenofovir studies was that it didn’t really have a pharmaceutical sponsor. Gilead Sciences, maker of tenofovir, provided free drug but offered no other backing for the studies. The actual trial sponsors/organisers including Family Health International and the US National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) will never be selling the product, nor are they in the business of providing long term treatment. “Not all sponsors are created equal. Our missions can be quite different,” said Dr Monica Ruiz of the US National Institutes of Health. “What we can do in terms of standard of care is determined by our mission.” And the NIH and NIAID do research. To provide longer care, they generally have to partner with other organisations.
And at the time, options were limited in Cambodia and Cameroon. At first, the trials tried to set up a programme of care only for the course of the study or for a two or three year period afterwards; and yet, some of the sponsors now admit that withdrawing support for treatment after a couple of years just wouldn’t have been right. “It is neither ethical or practical to offer a standard of care that cannot be sustained after the trial has finished — to do this would be unfair to participants and the community in which the research took place.” said Dr Ruiz.
Of course, it wasn’t acceptable to the activists either.
If there are any silver linings in the debacle of these tenofovir trials, it is that researchers have now realised that community participation is absolutely necessary to move forward with this sort of research — and that that will require more than token efforts at inclusion. At the Microbicides meeting, a whole track is now devoted to community involvement, which is seen not only as necessary for trials to run smoothly but as potential allies in the educational programmes, and to sustain support of microbicide research efforts. “Community mobilisation for microbicides should not be limited to awareness raising but should aim at building the capacity of communities to enhance development and/or improving community healthcare systems,” said Katende. The community can thus become a much richer resource for prevention researchers to draw on.
Finally, the controversy has forced researchers and sponsors to consider what is their obligation to provide quality treatment where it is not available. And even if they reject the moral arguments, “existing social and political realities make access to care an essential factor in a trial’s ability to go forward,” said Anna Forbes of the Global Campaign for Microbicides.
“Worldwide there is consensus among researchers and sponsors that care should be provided to participants who volunteer for screening and are excluded due to their HIV status and especially to those who become HIV positive during the course of the trial,” said Prof. Ramjee. Who should do it? Increasingly, it is being seen as a collaborative effort between the investigator, sponsor, pharmaceutical company, community and the local health department. Even the NIH is now routinely looking for partnerships to provide long-term care to the participants in its studies, and Dr Ruiz noted, agreeing that “research doesn’t happen in a vacuum.”
The HIV Prevention Research Unit Model
Prof. Ramjee believes it is the investigator’s responsibility to organise this effort — and she has developed a working model to manage HPRU’s seven trial sites involving over ten thousand women, and screening up to twice as many.
“When we talk about care, we need to look at the trialist perspective and the woman’s perspective. We need to look at what the trialist can do, and what the woman’s needs are,” said Prof. Ramjee.
The women who screen out of her trial because they are already HIV-positive may be in the most immediate need of HIV care and possibly treatment. Her model facilitates linkages to care in partnership with local health care providers. “So I have developed a memorandum of understanding between the trial site and each district government referral hospital which will assess the women’s need for treatment,” she said. Women with CD4s below 200 will be counselled to go on the treatment programme, while women not in immediate need of treatment will receive on-going monitoring of HIV infection. The trial site also provides the government with a regular report on the number of women have been referred from the trial (how they are assisting with the scale-up).
“Of course, the government is already overburdened so what can I do to help in order to help the government in the scaling up of treatment efforts for HIV positive women who are screening out of trials?” She has looked to external donors such as PEPFAR to help carry some of the burden. In particular, she has developed a partnership with Aurum Health, which receives funding from PEPFAR, setting up two sites adjacent to Aurum Health sites. “All the women that we screen out will go automatically to the PEPFAR site where they [receive ongoing HIV care] and when ART is required they will send them to the government hospital. However, if the hospital says that they are overburdened, PEPFAR has the capacity to provide them with drugs as well.”
Recently, they’ve begun a partnership with Broadreach Healthcare — another PEPFAR recipient, which is working with around 100 general practitioners. “I’m really pleased about this and this also deals with my problem working with the women who don’t want to go to the hospital where they may know somebody who knows them.”
“But eventually, all these women will go into the government system so we need to partner with the government on this.” She reiterated: “It’s very important that the government needs to be informed of what the memorandum of understanding is, as well as how you are assisting them with their scaling up numbers, because it’s very important that we all work together.”
For those women who seroconvert during the trial? “Within the trial, there should be the capacity to respond to short term care needs, including ongoing counselling, baseline CD4s, treatment of STIs, and condom promotion,” said Prof. Ramjee. The package of short-term care they have developed costs about $350 per woman per year. They also ask the women who test positive to bring in their partners in so that they can provide them with care.
She also believes the trial should assist the referral site with capacity building.
“They are asking for more counsellors, office space for counselling, for trial doctors to give some time to help manage the workload — so they aren’t really asking the earth, but I think we can include that sort of support within the clinical trial budget. Honestly this is not a lot.”
For the long-term care, they again develop a memorandum of understanding with the referral hospital. They may also refer the patient to enter other treatment trials or studies and to the PEPFAR sites. “I know that PEPFAR programme is a short term programme and that the money won’t be there forever but it does help us scale up our efforts,” she said.
And by partnering with other support organisations, she says that the trials are assisting with scale-up of HIV treatment and care. “All we are doing is giving them a little push in to the HIV treatment and care programme. Eventually all of them should get lifelong care.”
She believes that the sponsors should provide some form of support (funding) for seroconverters on the study (essentially for their short-term care), and for ART should any patients progress quickly.
She has seen at least one case of rapid progression that required ART. “The non-governmental sponsors provided treatment for that particular woman because it became urgent and the government referral hospital had a one month waiting list at the time, and we couldn’t wait. But we aren’t looking at thousands of women — these are just a few who will seroconvert — so we need to have some capacity built into the trial.”
“As a researcher, my responsibility is to ensure that there is a true partnership with the local government which is transparent so that each [party] knows what contribution the other is making.”
But she said that the appropriate linkages must be in place prior to trial implementation. “What are the referral structures? Who do we talk to? What sort of care does the women need. We need to do all of that quite well in advance and the memorandum of understanding is very important.”
“I don’t think anyone can tell anyone else what the standard of care should be. It’s a country specific standard of care plan, which is going to be possible if the researcher works with the local government (gets healthcare approval and understanding) and supported by sponsors. But it is a moving target. Today, I’m quite comfortable with what I’ve set up but tomorrow it might change, it’s a moving target. As a researcher, I feel comfortable that I have sorted out care for my screened out and my seroconverters.”
Need to perform follow-up
One thing Prof. Ramjee and HPRU may need to keep an eye on is whether women who screen or test positive actually show up at the referral hospital or PEPFAR site — which is a serious problem according to some presentations. For example, the Savvy trial in Nigeria was located in an area with existing HIV care (funded by PEPFAR). Even so, only 15 of 87 women from one trial site and 12 out of 17 at another have attended the PEPFAR clinic. “Some women are reluctant to return to our study clinic for counselling. Others refuse to attend the PEPFAR clinic for evaluation. Staff must use tact in contacting these women, since many have not informed their partners or relations of their serostatus,” the authors wrote.
Even in South Africa, there are problems accessing referral services. According to Dr Khatija Ahmed of the University of Limpopo, in the Population Council trial of Carraguard, they have conducted a preliminary assessment of the referral centers at the Medunsa/Soshanguve site, where nearly one out of four of those screened are HIV-positive, “which raised concerns that the existing infrastructure in the community might not be adequate to support the increased number of women seeking services.” 15 out of 20 women accessed referral services but they complained of long waits (up to seven hours), rude staff, stigmatization, and lack of resources at the clinics. Many women also lacked transportation to the clinic.
References
Ramjee G. Provision of care in HIV prevention trials - whose responsibility? Viewpoint of the researcher. Microbicides 2006 Conference, Cape Town, OB25, 2006
Singh J, Mills E (2005) The abandoned trials of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: What went wrong? PLoS Med 2: e234, 2005.
Ahmad K. Trial of antiretroviral for HIV prevention on hold. Lancet Infectious Diseases Vol 4, p. 597, 2004.
Weijer C, leBlanc, G. Revisiting the ethics of HIV prevention research in developing countries. UNAIDS, Geneva, 2005.
UNAIDS. Creating effective partnerships for HIV prevention trials: Report of a UNAIDS consultation: UNAIDS, 2006.
Forbes A. Not if but how: Assuring future access to care for those who sero-convert in trials. Microbicides 2006 Conference, Cape Town, PD25, 2006
Bakare R et al. Preliminary results of referral to HIV management in a microbicide trial. Microbicides 2006 Conference, Cape Town, PC5, 2006.
Khatija Ahmed et al. An evaluation of the strategies for care and support of women who test positive for HIV during screening for the Phase 3 Trial of Carraguard in Soshanguve, South Africa, Microbicides 2006 Conference, Cape Town, LB009, 2006.
News headlines
Generic version of abacavir approved for use by PEPFAR programmes
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced tentative approval for a generic version of abacavir tablets (300 mg), manufactured in India by Aurobindo Pharma. Abacavir sulfate tablets are the first generic version of the already approved Ziagen, an anti-HIV medication manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. Tentative approval makes this product available for consideration for purchase under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
Russia will not give methadone to drug users, says health chief
Russia’s chief public health official has told Russian reporters that methadone substitution therapy will not made available in the near future, despite growing pressure from the international public health community.
Russian HIV prevention mired in moralism and xenophobia
HIV prevention efforts in Russia and other members of the Confederation of Independent States are being crippled by religious dogmatism, paranoia about teenage sexuality and extremely repressive attitudes towards injecting drug use, as well as hostility towards non-governmental organisations perceived to be influenced by the west, according to delegates attending last week’s first Eastern European and Central Asian AIDS Conference in Moscow.
Block on methadone for drug users in Eastern Europe biggest barrier to treatment
Lack of access to substitution therapy now forms the biggest barrier preventing access to antiretroviral therapy in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, the first Eastern European and Central Asian AIDS Conference heard last week in Moscow.
HIV-positive children in UK and Ireland often given too low doses of antiretrovirals
A significant proportion of HIV-positive children in the United Kingdom and Ireland have been treated with suboptimal doses of antiretroviral drugs, according to a study published in the May 19th edition of the British Medical Journal.
Doctors develop tool for diagnosing immune reconstitution syndrome
A team of doctors from the University of Cincinnati have proven that a standard definition proposed by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group can be used to diagnose immune reconstitution syndrome in patients starting HIV treatment. The results of the study were published in the 1st June edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Directly administered antiretroviral therapy benefits drug users with adherence problems
Providing directly administered antiretroviral therapy (DAART, also known as directly observed therapy, or DOT) alongside opioid substitution therapy for injecting drug users (IDUs) may provide substantial clinical benefit to IDUs with previously adherence difficulties, according to the results of a study from the United States, published in the April 28th electronic edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases. An accompanying editorial calls the provision of DAART at methadone clinics a "highly promising" adherence intervention.
Motivational and behavioural interventions needed to reduce sexual risk by people with HIV
There is a “paucity” of studies examining sexual risk reduction amongst individuals diagnosed with HIV, according to American researchers. In a meta-analysis published in the April 15th edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes the investigators were only able to identify 15 randomised controlled trials examining interventions to increase condom use by people with HIV or reduce the number of their sexual partners. They contrast this to the “literally hundreds of studies conducted with uninfected populations.”
Microbicides 2006: Who will control microbicides?
Microbicides have been billed as a female-controlled HIV prevention method; but even though most women like the idea that they could use such a product without informing their partners, most would nevertheless prefer to tell their regular partners if they are using a microbicide, according to studies presented at the Microbicide 2006 conference. Some want to disclose the use of microbicides to enhance intimacy while others believe that gel-based lubricants would be detectable to their partners — and fear negative consequences.
HIV care should include routine STI screens, finds study
A significant proportion of women receiving antiretroviral therapy from public health facilities in Bangkok have a sexually transmitted infection (STI), according to a study published in the April 15th edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. Based on the findings of this study, the Thai public health ministry has expanded its provision of sexual health services for HIV-positive individuals.
Russia and neighbours encouraged to get to grips with world's fastest-growing HIV problem
Russia and its neighbours stepped up official recognition of the seriousness of the HIV crisis in the region yesterday with the opening of the First Eastern European and Central Asian AIDS Conference in Moscow, described as `long overdue` by UNAIDS head Dr Peter Piot.
Early weaning by HIV-positive mothers needs to be accompanied by nutritional support for infant
Reseachers in Cote D’Ivoire have found that encouraging HIV-positive mothers to cease exclusive breastfeeding altogether by the time their children are six months old greatly increases the risk of stunted growth unless mothers are able to introduce an adequate range of foods to replace the nutritional value of breast milk. The findings, published in the April edition of the journal Pediatrics, suggest that mother and child health programmes which seek to promote exclusive breastfeeding as a risk reduction strategy need to provide nutritional counselling at the time of weaning and may need to provide nutritional support too.
Scale-up 'education vaccine' in Zambia, concludes HIV prevalence study
A study funded by the Norwegian government and undertaken in Zambia shows a significant reversal of the trends seen previously between higher educational attainment and increased prevalence of HIV infection. The study, published in the April 24th edition of the journal, AIDS, suggests that HIV prevention campaigns are now reaching higher-educated Zambians in both urban and rural centres, but have not yet reached lower-educated populations. The authors argue that their data suggest current policies need to be reshaped from providing not just universal basic education but rather universal secondary education.
Microbicides 2006: Poor adherence reported in some of the microbicide studies
Women randomised to microbicides currently being evaluated in the clinical efficacy studies, described at the Microbicides 2006 Conference recently in Cape Town, report that they do not always use the products as consistently as they should, and in one study, adherence to the microbicides has been lower without condoms than when condoms are being used.
US anti-prostitution gag for HIV work unconstitutional, rules US judge
A United States federal judge has this week issued a preliminary injunction to prevent US government agencies that distribute HIV/AIDS funding from forcing two non-governmental agencies (NGOs) - the Alliance for Open Society International (AOSI) and Pathfinder International - to sign what is known as the "anti-prostitution pledge requirement".
Model reveals benefits of treatment on number of HIV infections and deaths from AIDS in resource-limited settings
Antiretroviral therapy is expected to have benefits both for individual patients and for public health in resource-limited settings, according to a mathematical modelling study presented in the 15th April edition of The Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.
Treatment simplification appears clinically safe in children with a detectable viral load
HIV-positive children who have a detectable viral load despite taking potent antiretroviral therapy may be able to safely simplify their HIV treatment without risking disease progression or a further increase in their viral load, according to a study published in the March 3rd edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. Treatment was simplified by discontinuing therapy with a protease inhibitor whilst maintaining nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor treatment, and although this led to a drop in CD4 cell percentage, in none of the children was this clinically significant.
Microbicides 2006: Microbicide efficacy studies target high risk women for enrolment
Several of the microbicide efficacy studies, such as the Cellulose Sulfate (CS) and Savvy trials, have tried to keep the sample size manageable by trying to enrol the women they believe are most at risk of contracting HIV — but this can be challenging.
Microbicides 2006: Are the microbicide clinical efficacy studies big enough?
The clinical efficacy trials being conducted on microbicides include some of the largest HIV-related clinical studies ever performed — and issues of study design and power are paramount to their success. Some of the challenges in designing these studies were discussed during an update session of the Microbides 2006 conference held from April 22nd to 26th in Cape Town, South Africa.
Microbicides 2006: High rates of pregnancy pose challenges for microbicide trials
Pregnancy is an outcome microbicide trials want to avoid for a number of reasons —unfortunately, unexpectedly high rates of pregnancy have been observed in several, though not all of these studies — especially in the studies involving women with multiple sexual partners (which are also being conducted in West Africa where contraceptive use is less frequent). Researchers at last month's Microbicides 2006 conference in Cape Town discussed how pregnancy is affecting ongoing microbicide studies.
Microbicides 2006: Microbicide activity against sexually transmitted infections could affect how good products look against HIV
A panel discussion at the Microbicides 2006 Conference focused on how STIs could affect microbicide research, looking at modelling projections of how a microbicide with anti-STI activity could affect STI transmission, the need to monitor anti-HSV-2 in microbicide studies and how complicated it may be to measure a microbicide's activity against an STI.
Microbicides 2006: Challenges for the clinical development of microbicides — overview
Even though the clinical development of microbicides, products used in the vagina or rectum to prevent HIV acquisition, has advanced dramatically in the last few years, study investigators are concerned about a number of challenges that could potentially undermine their ability to show whether these products truly work or not, according to progress reports at the Microbicides 2006 Conference last month in Cape Town.
Current WHO treatment access criteria may have limited impact on onward transmission of HIV
A study involving HIV-positive women in Kenya suggests that providing antiretroviral therapy to individuals with advanced HIV disease may only have a limited impact on HIV transmission. The study, which is published in the April 15th edition of the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, found that women with a CD4 cell count below 200 cells/mm3 had the highest genital shedding of HIV, but were the least sexually active. Women without any symptoms of HIV and a CD4 cell count above 350 cells/mm3 shed a smaller, but still significant amount of HIV in their genitals, and were the most sexually active.
Does HIV therapy restore TB-specific immunity? Studies give conflicting answers
Potent anti-HIV treatment boosts the immune system’s response to tuberculosis in HIV-positive children, according to a small study conducted in South Africa and published in the April 24th edition of AIDS. However, a separate study published in the same journal has found that a year’s potent anti-HIV treatment, even if a patient has a good CD4 cell count, does not fully restore tuberculosis-specific immune responses and that HIV-positive individuals still have increased susceptibility to the infection. HIV-positive individuals who may have latent infection with tuberculosis, or are at high risk of tuberculosis infection, should be closely monitored, the investigators recommend.
Treating HIV and TB at the same time does not compromise outcome for either infection
Taking anti-tuberculosis treatment at the same time as antiretroviral therapy does not reduce the virological success rate of anti-HIV treatment, a retrospective study published in the May 15th edition of The Journal of Infectious Diseases has found. The investigators, from London, also found that patients who took anti-tuberculosis and anti-HIV therapy at the same time had a similar rate of tuberculosis (TB) recurrence to that of HIV-negative patients treated for tuberculosis.
Microbicides 2006: how will microbicides be delivered?
Most of the leading microbicides have been formulated as gels. To make certain that enough microbicide is delivered, plastic applicators have been developed prefilled with a set volume of gel that a woman must insert into her vagina. A number of studies at the Microbicides 2006 conference addressed the acceptance of these devices and the uptake of this process (to be discussed in a later article). However, Professor Sharon Hillier of the University of Pittsburgh reviewed a number of other ways to deliver microbicides in earlier stages of development.
Microbicides 2006: what products are in the pipeline?
Although scientists have identified a great number of ways to disrupt HIV transmission, “the near term pipeline of microbicides ready to enter [early clinical studies] is fairly modest and... needs to be expanded rapidly,” Professor Sharon Hillier of the University of Pittsburgh and Magee-Women’s Hospital said at the start of the Microbicides 2006 conference held in Cape Town last week.
HIV Pharmacology Workshop: Explaining the genetic basis of AZT toxicity
At this workshop more so than in previous years, there was an increasing emphasis on the impact of pharmaco-genetics, the intersection between host genetic influences and drug metabolism.
HIV Pharmacology Workshop: The dangers of breaking up tablets for paediatric dosing
Further evidence that dividing adult Triomune tablets for use by children may result in under-dosing was presented last week at the HIV Pharmacology Workshop in Lisbon, and the workshop also heard the first bioequivalence data on a paediatric tablet formulation of Triomune, called Pedimune.
Tablet version of Kaletra receives European green light; MSF calls for fast registration in Africa
Abbott’s new tablet formulation of Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) has received a positive opinion from the scientific committee of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), the company announced today, and should receive marketing approval within three months. Abbott says that the approval allows it to go ahead to file for registration in developing countries.
Microbicides 2006: High concentrations of lime juice kill HIV but too caustic to use as a microbicide
Using high concentrations of lime juice as a vaginal douche to prevent HIV or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) can cause severe abrasions to the vaginal epithelium, and would probably only increase the risk of HIV transmission, according to a safety study presented at the Microbicides 2006 conference this week in Cape Town, South Africa. Although another study suggested that using lower concentrations (up to 20%) may be safer, laboratory studies have found such concentrations are too low to kill HIV.
Microbicides 2006: Treatment Action campaign marches for HIV prevention
Thousands of members of the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC), joined by dignitaries such as the Archbishop Desmond Tutu, marched to the Cape Town International Conference Centre on Sunday before the opening of the Microbicides 2006 conference to present a memorandum on prevention. The memorandum calls for greater political leadership from government, corporate commitment and civil society, and for community-driven prevention programmes setting clear targets both in South Africa and internationally. Specifically, TAC calls for a government commitment to prevent two million HIV infections by 2010.
Microbicides 2006 meeting opens with a focus on the women of Africa and the failure of existing HIV prevention methods
The international Microbicides conference opened on Sunday in Cape Town, South Africa, with a focus on the vulnerability to HIV infection of women in Africa (and elsewhere) — and the need to find better ways so that they can protect themselves from infection.
Accurate timing of drug doses improves response to HIV treatment
HIV-positive patients who take their HIV drugs at the same time every day have a better response to antiretroviral therapy, according to a longitudinal study published in the March edition of The Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. The study also confirmed that virological response is heavily dependent on the proportion of doses taken and the number of resistance mutations in a patient’s virus.
Cotrimoxazole, antiretroviral therapy, and insecticide-treated bednets dramatically reduce the frequency of malaria in Ugandan adults
Giving people HIV cotrimoxazole, antiretroviral therapy (ART), and insecticide-treated bednets (ITBs) reduces the frequency of malaria by 95%, according to a study published in the April 15th issue of The Lancet. The study, which was run by the United States' Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Uganda, demonstrated that each intervention contributed something to the preventative effect, reducing the incidence of malaria from a baseline of 50.8 episodes to 2.1 episodes per 100 person years.
Is protease inhibitor use during pregnancy linked to premature delivery?
An observational study from the University of Miami has found that the use of protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of premature delivery. The study’s findings were published in the 1st May edition of The Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Blood tests may be better than standard skin test for diagnosing latent tuberculosis
Two blood tests for diagnosing latent tuberculosis (TB) infection can each produce fewer false-positive results than the standard tuberculin skin test in patients presumed to be HIV-negative, according to a study in this week's issue of The Lancet.
High viral load and symptoms of primary infection mean worse survival, says study conducted in HIV-positive sex workers in Kenya
A high viral load soon after infection with HIV and severe symptoms caused by primary HIV infection are associated with an increased risk of death, according to a study conducted amongst female sex workers in Kenya and published in the May 1st edition of Clinical Infectious Diseases. The identification of these factors could distinguish, the investigators believe, which individuals would benefit from the timely initiation of antiretroviral therapy.
US government watchdog criticises PEPFAR prevention policy
US legislation which requires Federal-funded prevention programmes to spend at least a third of their prevention budgets on promoting sexual abstinence before marriage is causing serious implementation problems on the ground in the 15 countries receiving aid through the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, says a report from the US Congress’s Government Accountability Office published last week.
Jobs at NAM: Head of Funding & Partnership Development
NAM is recruiting for the post of Head of Funding & Partnership Development.
This new post is responsible for maximising income to support NAM’s expanding portfolio of information resources targeted at healthcare professionals working in resource-limited countries. You will also forge and manage partnerships with other agencies, some of which may be overseas, in support of this work. Lastly, to underpin NAM’s established programme of activity for patients and professionals in the UK, you will work closely with NAM’s director to secure income from new sources.
Please click here for full job description and further details about how to apply.
About HATIP
A regular electronic newsletter for health care workers and community-based organisations on HIV treatment in resource-limited settings.
Its publication is supported by the UK government's Department for International Development (DfID), the Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund and the Stop TB Department of the World Health Organization.
Other supporters include Positive Action GlaxoSmithKline (founding sponsor); Abbott Fund; Abbott Molecular; Cavidi; Elton John AIDS Foundation; Merck & Co., Inc.; Pfizer Ltd; F Hoffmann La Roche; Schering Plough; and Tibotec, a division of Janssen Cilag.
latest aidsmap news
- HIV/TB epidemic in Eastern Europe a 'public health disaster'
- Low bone mineral density common in HIV-positive men
- Circumcision may protect HIV-negative gay men from syphilis
- HIV 'exposure' from bite forms basis for terrorism charge in US case
- First hint of a hepatitis C vaccine?
- Pregnancy, not nevirapine cause of liver toxicities in HIV-positive women
- Surviving to die of something else: AIDS is a rare cause of death in old people with HIV
- New EACS guidelines address co-morbidities and diseases of age
- Small case series looks at etravirine during pregnancy
- Protease inhibitor monotherapy as a maintenance regimen: are we edging towards acceptance?